Who cares is India lost this match or even the tournament. It is deperessing but we shouldn't forget that this is not the typical Indian side. Maybe these players are good but lack the experience. Indian selectors are piece of shits. They are missing something called "brain". why would you send Indian A side to international tour when there are other tours available for A teams. to clean up the Indian cricket mess, get rid of the root of the cause, which is of course the Indian selectors.
How idiotic was it to open with two wicketkeepers? They could have opened with Ojha and Yusuf and had Karthik down the order.
No, I support India, hence I want them to win, regardless of the team they send.
It was a mistake sending so many new players, but had India won, everyone would be praising these guys. The toss seems to make a huge difference here too. When India won the toss, they won the match, but they've lost the toss on the other 3 occasions. Not an excuse, just shows how the pitch eases out in the afternoon.
@ Brook - Naman Ojha has only got one chance, while Vijay has had a couple. If Naman gets the same amount of chances, maybe he'd do better than Vijay. Taking a shot at people who wanted Naman in the team over his performance in one match was quite unnecessary.
Do wonder what Utseya does to be selected since they have plenty of bowling options.
I think there is a quota system in Zimbabwe Team. Just like there is quota system in the South African Team.
Ravindra Jadeja and Rohit Sharma's respective resurrections as quality cricketers were the only two things I liked about India's performance here.
Hopefully, this tri-nation series will be the last nail in the coffins of players like Yuseless Pathan and KKD Kartik. I find it funny how guys like KKD get picked again and again in the first XI despite failing in every match whereas talented blokes like Wriddhiman Saha sit as reserves no matter what performance they put up in the domestic level. Our selection procedure needs an overhaul, seriously.
LongLegs said:KDK > Saha. Unfortunately, KDK never opens in domestic cricket. So I find it harsh that people judge him when India play him as an opener.
LongLegs said:Saha is good, but I don't think he'll ever be successful internationally. Especially in shorter formats.
KKD hasn't opened in 31 of the 45 ODI matches he has played in his career. Now, even if I take out the games in which he has opened from his overall statistics, his batting average continues to look appalling (29.64).
Mine is not a knee jerk reaction based on Kartik's performance in this triseries only. I have been saying from the very beginning that he is not the right kind of player for international cricket. Sure, he's talented, but I believe that unless one is able to translate his potential to from, he needs to be out of the team to make way for the more deserving blokes out there.
It's not that we haven't given him enough opportunities to prove his mettle- we have, but let's face the fact; he hasn't been able to do anything significant as of now. How long will India carry him on its shoulders hoping that he'd get back his form all of a sudden one fine morning and guide the team to glory?
That's mere conjecture. You cannot predict how Saha will turn out to be in a ODI game as he hasn't played one yet.
We should at least give youngsters like Naman Ojha and Wriddhiman Saha some games to prove themselves before we jump the gun and say that they are no match for Kartik. If we give them chances and if they fail to perform in them, I'd be the first one to suggest that we should call back KKD. But we need to give them their deserved chances first and foremost, as it is clear as daylight that Kartik, albeit being talented is not performing upto his potential in international cricket for some reason or the other!