Pace or Swing?

Swing is much more suited to all forms of the game and harder to play. If the pitch isnt doing anything then all you need to do is get some bat on a fast bowler and if you hit the gap it'll race to the fence.
 
Swing is much more suited to all forms of the game and harder to play. If the pitch isnt doing anything then all you need to do is get some bat on a fast bowler and if you hit the gap it'll race to the fence.

I think you have been watching too many matches in the SC, pace bowlers do far better in general.
 
I think you have been watching too many matches in the SC, pace bowlers do far better in general.
I think you have been watching too many matches in Australia!:D, Swing bowlers tend to perform better in most pitches.
 
I think you have been watching too many matches in the SC, pace bowlers do far better in general.

Swing bowlers are much more effecient in Tests, especially on those hot days which is often considering cricket is a summer sport.
 
mcgrath isn't a swing bowler

i'll name steyn, morkel, johnson, bollinger, harris etc etc

wanna keep going?

Steyn swings it a mile.

Bracken is one of the best OD bowlers ever in Australia because of his swing. Compare that to Lee for example.

EDIT: ████ lol was thinking about Clark in OD's not lee
 
Last edited:
Steyn swings it a mile.

Bracken is one of the best OD bowlers ever in Australia because of his swing. Compare that to Lee for example.

Steyn also has big pace.

If you want someone that has just swing, take Praveen Kumar.

You can't say Bracken was a better bowler than Lee, in-fact most will disagree.
 
Steyn also has big pace.

If you want someone that has just swing, take Praveen Kumar.

You can't say Bracken was a better bowler than Lee, in-fact most will disagree.

Yes, and he also has big swing.

A bowling line-up of swing would be a lot more consistently effective than one of just pace. You would be confident taking a line-up of pure pace across the whole world?

Yeah, I realised I was thinking wrong. I was too slow to edit though.
 
Hmm, ok let's agree to disagree then.

It depends what bowler you consider as a swinger, pacer or both.

But I will say 1 thing, you will not find a pure swing bowler that has achieved anything in international cricket, the best swing bowlers also had a lot of pace.
 
That is true. But you also won't find a lot of pacers who can do much without swinging the ball.

Anyway I feel im more and more wrong as we've discussed this. You're right. But I also think the questions is a little hard because like you said and I just said, there arent many quality swingers without pace and there aren't many quality pacers without swing/movement.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top