End Game Contract Killer 3.0 - asprin V.I.P and his remaining bodyguard Till Valhalla wins!

[Till Valhalla]

??????

 

[Manish.]

They have spoken... @Parth D was evicted ... He warned them, but still...

Spoiler: Parth was

Bodyguard

Remaining Participants:
Ashutosh @Ashutosh.
asprin @asprin
Gaurav @Gaurav_7
Nilay @NILAYSHAH60
Till Valhalla @Till Valhalla
Manish @Manish.
Yash @Yash.

Day 2 is starting now - 36 hour timeline

Among the 7 remainings, 1 is a contact killer. Meanwhile me .

But that doesn't justify him playing the way he did. Claiming to be a killer and then saying play smart.

Partially agree with you, I felt the more way that he is not interested and putting forward himself for Lynch.

We have made a mistake but I doubt there was anything else we could do at the time.

Bodygaurdsssss, Assemble. I see RUDI has followed a pattern in assigning roles. Is that true @RUDI or just random? Can we reveal roles ? It's day 2 and we are still clueless about who is the contract killer.

Lynch Manish

The reason for Lynch is for posting without reading rules? Wow. Okay, I went up to RUDI for clearing certain rules and asking to extend some time on day 1. He is offline, so stated to Lynch.

 

[asprin]

Meanwhile me .

What is this supposed to mean?

 

[Manish.]

What is this supposed to mean?

Reaction for how to figure out who is a killer.

 

[Gaurav_7]

Bodygaurdsssss, Assemble. I see RUDI has followed a pattern in assigning roles. Is that true @RUDI or just random? Can we reveal roles ? It's day 2 and we are still clueless about who is the contract killer.

I am sure Rudi has assigned the roles at random. Okay even if he has followed a pattern as you say, so who do you think is who?

The reason for Lynch is for posting without reading rules? Wow. Okay, I went up to RUDI for clearing certain rules and asking to extend some time on day 1. He is offline, so stated to Lynch.

You still don't realize you were not allowed to lynch that time?

 

[Manish.]

You still don't realize you were not allowed to lynch that time?

Frankly, I didn't notice that rule.

 

[asprin]

Frankly, I didn't notice that rule.

So you were aware that a re-vote has to be done but not about who is disqualified from re-voting? That's kind of hard to believe given that all instructions were present in the same post.

 

[Till Valhalla]

I am jot convinced with Manish defence.

m. Okay even if he has followed a pattern as you say, so who do you think is who?

No answer to this too.

 

[Gaurav_7]

Seems more like he overlooked that bit but still worth a suspicion.

Also we need people like Yash, Ashutosh, Nilay to speak too.

 

[Yash.]

I have classes till 12 pm. I’ll post my views after that.

 

[NILAYSHAH60]

If 2 people I am suspicious about then they are @Manish. & @Ashutosh.

@Manish. has consistently claimed being unaware of what he is supposed to do. Being confused is a different thing but not knowing anything at all doesn't sound valid.

And @Ashutosh. , what has he done thus far? Only make a defence post for himself when he was about to be lynched.

Now since we already lost @Parth D, I want to see who of these 2 gets more votes and only then I may join the bandwagon.

 

[Till Valhalla]

these 2 gets more votes and only then I may join the bandwagon.

Very suspicious statement.

My mafia to town
Manish || Nilay
Ashutosh
Asprin
Yash|| Gaurav

 

[NILAYSHAH60]

Very suspicious statement

The statement does make sense. You don't want to lose anymore Bodyguard because of a random guess, as that would make it easy for the Contract Killer to find the VIP.

 

[asprin]

We seem to be have found ourselves tangled with inactivity again. Apart from me, TV and Gaurav not much from the others. Just 1-2 sentences here and there.

Post automatically merged: Mar 29, 2022

You don't want to lose anymore Bodyguard because of a random guess, as that would make it easy for the Contract Killer to find the VIP.

Then how would a couple of votes convince you to vote? If you're voting for someone, you ought to have some semblance of an explanation as to why you're voting against someone - it surely can't be "lol, you have two votes on you, take one from me too...heuheue"

 

[NILAYSHAH60]

Then how would a couple of votes convince you to vote? If you're voting for someone, you ought to have some semblance of an explanation as to why you're voting against someone - it surely can't be "lol, you have two votes on you, take one from me too...heuheue"

Isn't that what you did with your previous lynch of @Parth D ?