Why are the reviews increasingly negative?
I also have this feeling Big Ant could do anything these days and a lot of people would be negative about it. Deserved or not I do think that’s a thing.
Why are the reviews increasingly negative?
A valid point. I am keen to see if this is a new way of developing for them that enables them to get the game to a place where everyone is generally happy.I also have this feeling Big Ant could do anything these days and a lot of people would be negative about it. Deserved or not I do think that’s a thing.
Thanks mate. I'm not a high level player, I've got some skill . TieBreak has a lot to offer in gameplay area to master all the possibilities. When I started to play, the game was easier in EA. Now medium is harder than Expert on EAFor me they haven't got the skill levels fine tuned enough on easy i can win 6-0 and on medium lose 6-0 .Playing on easy in top spin i can win and lose but most points are long rallys and you can only play exhibition matches and not tournements nor can you save games.Both have their problems.Saturator is a very high level player for most the experience won't be like that.Its not really pick up and play also people that like games tend not to review.I wouldn't put too much stock in steam reviews.NBA2k 25 is coming out in a day or watch it get totally panned on steam yet there will be thousands playing it.
It depends of the style of your serv. If flat, you have to wait the full animation. If slice or curved, you can served immediatly. Same for Djokovichow did you get it so Nadal serves straight away and doesn't bounce the ball 100 times before serving?
We are talking a different of 54 to like 45. Lol. Besides AFL has zero other competition, Tiebreak has about 3 other tennis games just within the last few years.It’s crazy seeing more people are playing AFL 23 on Steam compared to Tiebreak. Especially considering one is meant to be a global game, while the other is largely only relevant to Australia.