Maybe about 60/6. Then Bhajji will build a partnership with one of the remaining batsmen and we'll end up with around 120 perhaps.We've already lost this match. You can tell by the way we've started, as soon as we look to attack, we look extremely vulnerable.
*Sigh*
We all know what's going to happen now, collapse!!
To his credit, it looked out in real time. I think the original decision was not out, though... but Rohit apparently convinced Bowden to talk to Taufel--who I'm not sure had any right to say anything since the catch was taken cleanly.Bowden sucks.
Benn comes on in the 13th over!
That's a good observation. Bhajji is the only wicket-taking bowler in our team (keeping in mind that we are only playing 3 front-line bowlers) and he cannot really attack if those around him are leaking runs. Our pace bowlers are all guys who try to limit the damage rather than create any themselves. That's how our line-up has been for ages, though. In Tests, the likes of Ishant and Zaheer can be considered wicket-takers if the conditions are offering a bit of assistance.I don't know if it's just because that's the way they learned their game, but the key for me is that India's bowling attack isn't very good at taking wickets. Harbhajan is their big weapon and he's not a wicket every over kind of guy, at least, not if the other bowlers aren't pressuring the batsman to take a risk off him.
The West Indies on the other hand, with pace and variety have done a better job of weakening the other team by getting them out. They have bowlers with better strike rates in T20 and it shows by their ability to get 5 wickets in 13 overs, instead of 1.