Tendulkar is counted as T20 player though unlike laraWas a simple choice for me between Lara and Tendulkar. Went with Tendulkar since he was a local.
Tendulkar is counted as T20 player though unlike laraWas a simple choice for me between Lara and Tendulkar. Went with Tendulkar since he was a local.
I know that... Already have my PreT20 players planned so no problemTendulkar is counted as T20 player though unlike lara
No VARP?![]()
Chetan Sharma
Never played Twenty20 cricket
ODI stats: 456 runs @ 24.00 (SR: 90.47, 1 century, best 101*) and 67 wickets @ 34.68 (econ: 4.94, best 3/22) in 65 matches
![]()
Chetan Sharma was a better player than his stats suggest, capable on his day of both 96-ball ODI hundreds and all-bowled World Cup hat-tricks. He's the perfect kind of player to hover at around seven or eight in a Twenty20 batting order, whilst also sending down about three overs per game. And if he doesn't come off, as is occasionally going to be the case, it doesn't matter - there are plenty more options in the side to pick up the slack. He's a low-use, high-impact all-rounder - somewhat like a fast bowling Rahul Tewatia.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
View attachment 239969 View attachment 239968![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
1.![]()
Chris Gayle
2.![]()
Kris Srikkanth
3.![]()
Charlie Macartney
![]()
4.![]()
AB de Villiers
5.![]()
Vinod Kambli
6.![]()
Hardik Pandya
7.![]()
Chetan Sharma
8. -
9. -
10.![]()
Joel Garner
![]()
11. -
@Yash.
He moved around the batting order too much for it to be an effective measure; and his bowling one would just be a bit crap I thinkNo VARP?
Strike rate of 90 in an era when that didn't happen, and a decent bowler of inswinging yorkers? I'm getting him in. He'll probably end up batting at about eight and not always having to bowl, but he's a hugely underrated cricketer and I'd back him to deliver in a push. Given the remaining players I have in mind, I'm very confident of having room in my team for a bit of a luxury player.