fiction
County Cricketer
- Joined
- May 2, 2013
Reminder; This thread is for Improvements to PlanetCricket...
I see what you did there.
Reminder; This thread is for Improvements to PlanetCricket...
Why would you use an example of something that clearly doesn't work [YouTube's globally heralded lowest common denominator discussion system] as an example of anything? I don't understand, genuinely.
Oh,give him a break.Well if you didn't spend half an hour slacking...
So you agree with me, you're just being obstinate because, Blocker. Gotcha. I wasn't talking about "liking" the videos on YouTube, I was talking about their comment system, which is what I assumed you were referring to, this being a discussion on a comment system not videos.
Bloggers want comments, correct. Generally the upvote/downvote system is user-moderation of comments so "RON PAUL 2012!" stuff gets voted down (and removed, eventually) by user-generation which removes the need to have administrators monitoring the content. Since PlanetCricket has a great selected-user based moderation system which is effective in a forum setting where you want everyone to be heard, however batshit insane at times, there's no need to introduce a button which does exactly the same function as a regular user-group does by forming sentences and reporting posts that offend or mention cake too much.
A "downvote" or similar system will only enforce the negative, create factions of people who target specific users and in a creative environment where art and graphics for games are involved, create conflict and stymie creativity among new users. There's already about 8 - 10 people in certain forums that will only "thank" specific users and not anyone else, for example. Ross gets "thanked" because, he's Ross. Thats a positive impact of a "thanks" button... but the equal and opposite reaction would occur for other users, especially younger ones. Not much fun for them.
You only need to look at social media for proof of why a downvote system does not fit the ethos or encourage group-based discussion. The three biggest social networks have no function to enforce the negative but plenty to encourage the positive.
Alternate views to the majority create discussion, a LOT of discussion. There's no further proof required than the last few pages where the minority have had plenty of airtime and the majority have coherently explained their logical position. Rather than everyone receiving downvotes and upvotes like we're in kindergarten and it's a popularity contest.
This is better.
EDIT:
Also I love the new mobile view... works perfectly on Android. Wonderful.
I've added the Quick Quote button to that section, so find the post, select the text you want to quote and click the button and it will add it to the reply box up the top.Here's a thing that I'd quite like. Would it be possible to incorporate quote buttons into the topic review section below a reply window? I know that a multi-quote feature exists, but sometimes I go to quote multiple people and forget one, and being able to scroll down and select the post would be easier that going back into the thread and C+Ping a quote from another reply..