I guess you live in a binary universe where there are only two extremes.Yes, Dean. Go back to being the mindless, opinionless drone that is expected of you as a Mod. God forbid you do anything else than put up vBookie threads.
I've stopped posting because any reasonable comments are being ignored. For example, pal and prarara have posted many reasonable reactions to the situation which many of the Aussie+neutral members have simply ignored, just so that they can have a dig at the more passionate and patriotic members.If you don't like this thread, then don't reply to it. The staff have discussed this thread and found it unanimously okay.
I believe it is the same staff member that closed the Australia-India thread during the real-time heat. I guess it was an attempt to make another effort to discuss the issue, but surely you must agree that the way the topic was presented only invited bad feelings.Personally I don't see anything wrong with a staff member asking the question. I think in light of recent events its a fair question to ask. If people can't discuss the issue with maturity then perhaps thats their own problem.
That's a little too wordy.That's because people didn't think about the question. Maybe if it had have been worded differently by Dean, worded neutrally say:
"If a team threatens to pull out of a tour, when something happens they don't like, is it bringing cricket into disrepute?"
Then it has nothing to do with the Aussies and pulling out of the tour would be to punish a match referee rather than the Australians and ICC.it's not that I'm saying symonds & co. made a mistake by complaining to appropriate authorities. But waht I am saying is that all the furore and war of words was due to the fact that procter ruled against harbahajan without appropraite evidence of racial abuse. There was no problem in the fact that bhajji and symo abused each other but whether bhajji's was racial 'monkey' or 'maa ki' that has to be proved. That's all.
So I'm or not complaing abt complaint lodged by Ponting but abt the fact that Procter ruled without evidence of racial abuse. i dont think anybody will have a problem if procter had punished bhajji for abusing.
Perhaps, but once again, I'm talking about this issue, and the thread title is merely an expression of it. If it is not worded in a particular way, that is not something to interpret differently.That's because people didn't think about the question. Maybe if it had have been worded differently by Dean, worded neutrally say:
"If a team threatens to pull out of a tour, when something happens they don't like, is it bringing cricket into disrepute?"
I wonder if the thread 'Is the Australian cricket team too arrogant on the cricket field ? would have been allowed to continue.
So you think the whole of the PC staff are anti-Indian now?
A thread titled that would be allowed, infact we've probably had one. Certainly been discussed in-topic.
Im pretty sure there was a thread about it, either that or it was discussed to death in the Australia - India forum
I wonder if the thread 'Is the Australian cricket team too arrogant on the cricket field ? would have been allowed to continue.
So you think the whole of the PC staff are anti-Indian now?
I never suggested that....
Considering that nearly 30% of the staff/admin/global mods are Australian, and taking into account that the forum leaders are largely mature and neutral members, I'd say that there's bound to be some notion of PC being pro-Aussie (however small that tendency is). However, it would be more accurate to say the forum is pro-English.Well actually you are implying that any thread, "having a go at the Aussie Cricket Team" would be closed. Maybe not so much anti-Indian but Pro-Aussie is what it looks like you said about the staff.
You're contradicting yourself, though. The issue cannot be forgotten by opening a thread about it...Regarding the issue as I have maintained the whole time I think the sooner this issue is over the sooner it can be forgotten.
Considering that nearly 30% of the staff/admin/global mods are Australian, and taking into account that the forum leaders are largely mature and neutral members, I'd say that there's bound to be some notion of PC being pro-Aussie (however small that tendency is). However, it would be more accurate to say the forum is pro-English.
You're contradicting yourself, though. The issue cannot be forgotten by opening a thread about it...
The issue isn't the tour, though. The issues are a couple of things that cropped up--poor umpiring in Sydney and the Bhajji fiasco.Also I'm not really contradiciting myself, because the ODI series is happening now, so how can it be forgotten??? Maybe I didn't make myself clear. What I meant in issue was the whole tour.
But I do think it might have been best if this thread had not been created, but it was and I think people should have been able to act and post maturely in it.
sohummisra said:I believe it is the same staff member that closed the Australia-India thread during the real-time heat. I guess it was an attempt to make another effort to discuss the issue, but surely you must agree that the way the topic was presented only invited bad feelings.
The issue isn't the tour, though. The issues are a couple of things that cropped up--poor umpiring in Sydney and the Bhajji fiasco.
Why not? If you want to start a discussion, it is your right, just as it is mine.I wonder if the thread 'Is the Australian cricket team too arrogant on the cricket field ? would have been allowed to continue.