gold639 said:Yeah Murali is much younger and will play for 2-3 more than Warnie.
Rahul I think you are from Mumbai or at least from India, did u see the Espn Cricket Show special for Murali, where he put his in plaster of paris cast and bowled all the suspect deliveries to Shastri and Slater...a real proof that he doesn't chuck broadcast across south asia. The truth is that he doesn't chuck, its just that his action is too incongruous in this cricket world. That doesn't take away anything from Warne. One who could bowl the delivery of last century to Gatting and a similar ripper to Basit Ali is sure the very best. the best leg spinner to walk on the planet till date. And I believe he was forseeing rightly when he said "Murali will pick up 1000"(at least 650-700). He has too many years left in him.rahulk666 said:With all due respect to Murali I think the world will admire Warne more than Murali. No matter how many wickets Murali takes, the label "chucker" will always take some shine off of his illustrious career.
I am from Mumbai, India currently in the U.S.sachinisgod said:Rahul I think you are from Mumbai or at least from India
I did not see but heard about it. That does not mean he will not chuck (by bowling the banned doosra) in real matches. If that is the case let him bowl with the plaster in real matches too.sachinisgod said:did u see the Espn Cricket Show special for Murali, where he put his in plaster of paris cast and bowled all the suspect deliveries to Shastri and Slater...a real proof that he doesn't chuck broadcast across south asia.
sachinisgod said:btw if Parthiv has to be replaced(he should be after those gigantic amounts of runs he gave away), I believe either Ajay Ratra or Dhoni are better replacements than Deep Dasgupta.
sachinisgod said:Though u cannot displace a batsman who has a year average of 50+ against the toughest of opponents that easily.
vibs89 said:Are u from USA or MUMBAI Well i am from USA