So we are back to accepting our spinners going at 4 an over against India again? Also Hauritz was taken to in a few overs, does that make him a part timer too?
And again are you seriously comparing Warne and Murali to Hauritz? Fine they didn't take 700 wickets when playing India, but unless you are saying Hauritz is equal to the level of Warne and Murali then don't even think about using that comparison with Hauritz.
? I meant that North didn't have to bowl as many overs as Hauritz and got taken off a couple of overs after he took Tendulkar's wicket, so the batsmen weren't given the chance to settle and attack his bowling, which would've affected his economy rate.
Also, explain to me what has Hauritz having to be as good as Warne and Muralitharan got to do with the validity of the comparison?