I noticed there's been a fair bit of Ponting bashing. "Only wins because of his team." Perhaps this is true, but he is one of the best players in his team and I believe this is an important factor.
Compare Ponting's stats to Ganguly's. They're at about the same point in their Test careers (Ponting 85; Ganguly 79), however, there are twice as many hundreds (11 to 21) and twice as many catches (53 to 105) to Ponting. Of course Ponting has only been captain for 10 matches, but from these stats I am inclined to assume that Ponting is far better at winning matches with his own performances, thus a great leader and inspiration for his team, if not necessarily a master of tactic and strategy.
If he leads his team well in the field, doesn't indulge in demoralising behaviour and is good at winning matches that his team appears to be loosing (not implying that other captains don't), does this not mean he is thus a good captain?