Without being a dick also... And with the following i mean bowling and AI vs AI cricket. I bat occasionally but not that often.
What's hacked me off about all BA franchise games, is that sliders aren't quite as simple as they sound, and now there are so many of them, they don't sound that simple. (The bounce issue for one, think it's been fixed?)
I am almost 100 per cent convinced that all the player attributes in DBC14 did absolutely nothing at all. (I might be completely wrong about this, but that's in the past). I remember bowling at a skill-less Tendai Chatara who hit 180 or something at Perth. Having had Zimbabwe at 55/5 or something, and I think even
@blockerdave would have been tinkering with some attributes. I've put most of my professional and non-professional life into cricket, so I knew I wasn't entirely wrong. Then came the addition of "mentalities" and yes we've conversed on that for ages and ages...
This put me on the back foot with BA. I felt cheated and that I'd wasted lots of hours on trying to make a cricket game feel like the game we love on TV.
What was awesome though was evidently the style, the presentation, the fact they have been active in a market that obviously doesn't make a load of dosh. The bare-bones cricket looks and feels absolutely superb, and dare I say polished.
But it has always come from a position of defensiveness and not benefit of the doubt, because of DBC14, and that's why.
Yasir Shah has just spun a googly through an aggressive Kevin O'Brien who was looking dangerous. It's probably taken 3,000 hours of bowling or watching, but it's the best cricket I've seen about now, so yes I will enjoy it. But there is a reason for the position of defensiveness from my point of view anyway.
No doubt in half an hour I'll find something out like left handers can't be bowled or something mad...