I may have gone and got this under the assumption that I can just write a persuasive statement to Sony for a refund within 14 days, if it's shit.
Started a test between Ireland and Pakistan (Abrar bowls LM by the way) and in all honesty it's not too bad but it's not great and it's most definitely not justifying of the AA price. Gameplay is smoother but the same old bugs really do it no favours in helping to disassociate itself from C22.
So far at lunch Pakistan are 107-2. I got a nice caught behind off Adair and a catch at silly mid on to White's legspin which I thought was off the toe but on replay it was just a badly timed flick straight to the fielder. There are some eyewatering C22 fielding moments (overhaul lol) and as Blocker rightly says the ambient sounds are pretty non existent, like playing cricket in a vacuum. My biggest bugbear so far and how this got past QA testing is beyond me, is the application of the commentary, it is utterly, without exaggeration, indefensible.
This game is in a better state than C22 was when it was released but I'm not sure it is in a better state than Big Ant and the community got C22 to in the end.
I'll play some more when my 14 year old stops playing Siege but as it stands, I'll wait and see what comes with patches over the next week as to whether my persuasive writing skills will be required.