Just when I was thinking your post was making so much sense I ran into this (and to top it you marked it as the most imp point).
All I would ask you is, have you ever played real cricket in life?? If you have, which I'm sure is true, you would know that playing a defensive shot can be equally or more difficult than playing an aggressive shot in real life as well. It all depends on the kind of delivery and your position. At time it's easier to hit a ball aggressively than to defend it. The game captures this facet of cricket 'perfectly'.
Watch more cricket dude.....batsmen get out on defensive strokes as much as they do on aggressive ones.
----------
QUOTE]
Completely disagree with this. Question I ask - have you ever played competitive cricket? Ever? If batsmen get out playing defensive strokes which make them no runs as much as they do on aggressive ones then why do they play them then? What is the point of the defensive stroke? To look good??? Why dont you see batsman who are batting for a draw attempting massive cover drives if apparently "a defensive shot can be equally or more difficult than playing an aggressive shot in real life as well".
Defense is all about PROTECTING YOUR WICKET. This is cricket 101. Getting your head in line with the ball, smothering the ball, and not getting out.
In the game, defense is just as hard to execute as a standard stroke. And you cant be a good batsman, in test cricket anyway, without having a sound defence as a base foundation.
His initial post made perfect sense. The default stroke to play should be defence. But in the game its easier to execute a riskier straight drive than a defensive stroke.