That makes sense
You can't know anything about the quality of the game until there has been a detailed playtest.
A demo?
That makes sense
That's a fairly simplified view of the situation. I Think there's a lot of things at play but I would absolutely say cricket and games have never been more prominent. If Matts video of madness unfolding in Ashes can get to 150,000 views on YouTube imagine what a really good "Features List" video would do, showcasing the massive roll call of things in DBC14.
I don't think it's quite like that, but the negative reaction from the general public as well as the reaction here would absolutely given him pause. "What if we've missed something?" would be playing on his mind, he doesn't strike me as the kinda guy to not be sure he has his i's dotted, you know?
Maybe the extra time "given" by the Ashes fallout is a convenient excuse to shove the date a little to double-down on bug catching and game polishing?
I haven't always been totally convinced of 'the game is ready to go whenever' but I am totally convinced it's been a superior product all along. I think the caution comes more now from wanting to be absolutely certain there's nothing major they've missed.
Ive been saying since October that the game probably wasn't finished yet, I would say it now looks pretty likely that I have been right. Theres nothing wrong with delaying it to fix bugs, its a pro, but the line we've kept being fed that its ready to go was clearly not true when its missed the ideal release time to a game which they claim they knew was inferior all along.
Big Ant are releasing the game when it is most beneficial for them. Not just you.
Biggs
Don't you think that there is only so much advertising or so many things you can do to make a cricket game a success?
Every game has bugs u can't make perfect
Every game has bugs u can't make perfect
With the right team and the right campaign you can sell anything to anyone no matter how good or bad.
In short; no.
With the right team and the right campaign you can sell anything to anyone no matter how good or bad. You also need the right amount of zeros in the budget. This is clearly a grass roots game with a big heart if Ross re-mortgaged his castle in South Melbourne he could probably pay for half a campaign from a huge agency but now is the time to strike, really. I don't think the budget is there for that sort of thing nor do I think the reaction from the general public to how bad Ashes was gives him much confidence that his title won't be confused for that one. I think that's the issue here. While I don't think people ARE that stupid, in reality, there's plenty of evidence to suggest people would genuinely believe any cricket title coming out now would suck because that's what the news is all about.
This game seems loaded with Online play in no other way than before, but none of that has been seen or tested publically. That may also be a concern for him, we all saw how botched online for SimCity and GTA went down, cricket is a much smaller thing but given the Ashes backlash, he wouldn't want to be the next cab off the rank and having major issues with online.
It's a complex situation and it's 50/50 which is the right direction to go in.
The third, unlikely scenario that is a reach, is that he puts a call into both cricket boards (ECB, CA) sends him a copy of the game, does a deal on licences and delays the game until next season to work in an official Ashes tournament and/or more licensed kit, players and more. Doubt that would happen, but I've no doubt he's probably been on the phone to Cricket Australia at the very least to see what can be done, they're clearly keen to get their brand in Cricket Games. PURE hypotheticals and speculation though.
What u just said that means ashes game was unable to release on either PC Playstation or Xbox.If It got rejected (Not Seems though);Because animations are fantastic then Ashes is like a Mountain height distance behind it.You would have thought during the ashes build up or during the ashes when interest in the sport would be ideal.
But Big Ant must havr done some crazy market research, crunched some crazy numbers and done some crazy behind the scene stuff to decide this game should be delayed.
Don't hate me for speculating, but could it be possible that this game had not yet been submitted to sony or microsoft for approval?
Can it be possible it HAD been been submitted but rejected maybe because iy was buggy or had issues?
Could it be possible that due to tje crap Mike Fegan was spitting Big Ant thought their game needed further improvements?
Whatever it is it seems Ross hasn't kept his word on a 2013 release date
That's a fairly simplified view of the situation. I Think there's a lot of things at play but I would absolutely say cricket and games have never been more prominent. If Matts video of madness unfolding in Ashes can get to 150,000 views on YouTube imagine what a really good "Features List" video would do, showcasing the massive roll call of things in DBC14.
I don't think it's quite like that, but the negative reaction from the general public as well as the reaction here would absolutely given him pause. "What if we've missed something?" would be playing on his mind, he doesn't strike me as the kinda guy to not be sure he has his i's dotted, you know?
Maybe the extra time "given" by the Ashes fallout is a convenient excuse to shove the date a little to double-down on bug catching and game polishing?
I haven't always been totally convinced of 'the game is ready to go whenever' but I am totally convinced it's been a superior product all along. I think the caution comes more now from wanting to be absolutely certain there's nothing major they've missed.
They wouldn't have showed their game openly then.