^Yay, Ray Lindwall got picked! Been waiting for him to go all round to be honest. At least that makes my choice easier.
I was tossing up which all-rounder to pick out of
Monty Noble and
Wilfred Rhodes. Now I'll just take both!
Both Noble and Rhodes have imposing Ashes records. They each have 100 plus Ashes wickets, averaging a touch under 25. Both have over 1500 Ashes runs, both averaging a tad over 30. Both have batted at most positions in the batting the order, and both have even done well opening the batting - despite being known more for their bowling. I don't know where they'll end up in my batting order, but it gives me fantastic flexibility. Rhodes will be a nice spin partner for Jim Laker, turning the ball the opposite way, while Noble will bowl his fast medium swingers/swervers/cutters as my 3rd seamer.
More info on them tomorrow...
Cricket icon is up again to start round 5.
EDIT:
Monty Noble
Ashes stats:
Tests: 39
Runs: 1905
Average: 30.72
Wickets: 115
Average: 24.86
Best series: 1903/04 in Australia. Noble made 417 runs @ 59.57, and took 16 wickets @ 20.5. Australia lost the Ashes though...Could argue for his 1901/02 series where he was the leading wicket taker for the series with 32 wickets @ 19, but made far less runs (138 @ 15.33).
While looking through some stats to find an Ashes all-rounder who might slip under the radar, Noble's influence caught my eye. I found this nugget: only 3 all-rounders in Ashes history have had multiple series where they've made 200 runs, taken 10 wickets, and had a batting average greater than their bowling average. Miller, Botham and Noble have done that 3 times each - no one else has done it more than once. If you extend that to 300 runs and 10 wickets, then Noble is out on his own ahead of Botham and Miller. Can't argue with the man's production. It's obvious how valuable he was to Australia too. When Noble had a forgettable 1905 series (averaging only 19 with bat and taking only 6 wickets @ 68), Australia didn't win a Test.
Noble's batting was versatile, able to change depending on game situation. Generally known as an attacking player back home in Australia, he made two stonewalling half-centuries at Manchester in 1899 to ensure Australia held on for a draw after following on. Noble batted everywhere from 1-9 over his career, most innings at #4,5 or opening. It didn't seem to worry him: in the 1899 series for example, he made 367 runs @ 52 for the series, and made 50s while in 3 different positions: opening; #3 and #5.
His bowling was interesting. Noble was a fast-medium spinner. Sounds like a contradiction in terms, but it was a genuine mixture of pace and spin, sometimes combined with a bit of swing. Noble was a pioneer of this 'swerve' bowling. It was a technique that the Australians picked up on a trip to Philadelphia on the way home from the 1899 Ashes tour. Noble (and other Aussies) then used these techniques to great effect in the 1901/02 Ashes series, where Noble was the leading wicket-taker. He took 7/17 and 13/77 for the match to destory England at the MCG in that series. It's said that even the great Sydney Barnes approached Noble for help:
"Barnes said he once asked Noble: 'if he would care to tell me how he managed to bring the ball back against the swerve.'"
Interesting article about it here:
Amol Rajan on the forgotten art of medium-pace spin | Cricinfo Magazine | ESPN Cricinfo
Noble was valuable in the field and dressing room too. According to various sources his captaincy was bold, astute and effective, winning 8 of his 15 Ashes Tests in charge (5 losses, only 2 draws). Wisden also noted him as "a superb field at point-quick, agile and fearless".
Was fun finding out more about him, definitely deserves a little bit more love from Aussie fans (and cricket fans in general).
Wilfred Rhodes
Ashes stats:
Tests: 41
Runs: 1706
Average: 31.01
Wickets: 109
Average: 24.00
Best series: Depends...with the bat it was 1911/12 tour of Australia where he made 463 runs @ 57.87 opening with Hobbs, with the ball it was 1903/04 when he took 31 wickets @ 15.74
Started out as a specialist bowler, a crafty left arm spinner who was happy to throw the ball up. Yet by the time he'd reached the midway point of his career he was opening the batting for England with "The Master" Jack Hobbs! Doing pretty well too. Hobbs and Rhodes opened 18 times in Ashes Tests for 1101 partnership runs (61.17 avg). After WW1 he started bowling again, but by then he was well into his 40s and past his best. Not sure he ever got both disciplines working at their peak at the same time (a bit like Imran Khan perhaps), but it showed that Rhodes had the talent to switch from emphasising his batting to his bowling almost at will, depending on what the team required.
His career was particularly remarkable because he played Test cricket over 31 years! (1899-1930, still the record). During his career he played an innings at every position in the batting order. Rhodes holds a buttload of records in English county cricket too eg. most matches played, most wickets, most seasons of 1000 runs + 100 wickets (16 - will NEVER be beaten) etc.
Best Ashes performances? Took 15/124 for the match at the MCG in the 1903/04 series. Also took 7/17 in the 1902 series at Edgbaston to dismiss Australia for just 36 - their lowest ever score. The wicket was good, England had just made 376 on it. A 3rd performance on note would be when Rhodes and Hobbs put on 323 while opening the batting in 1911/12 to pass the Australian score of 191 without losing a wicket.
I've got no idea of batting orders right now, Rhodes and Noble can bat anywhere...
1
2 Wilfred Rhodes
3 Sir Donald Bradman (c)
4 Ken Barrington
5
6
7
8 Monty Noble (vc)
9 Jim Laker
10
11