@RichieBGM in response to the question about pitches.. it is true that Indian pitches are more oriented towards batting these days. Pacers were arguably better than the spinners in our last few home series, the early days of Kohli's captaincy where a minefield per series and dustbowls were common seems to be over. And it should stay that way, the excessively spin heavy pitches did nothing but aid spinners from the opposition by helping them with unpredictability while the skill difference between Indian spinners and opposition spinners was reduced due to the pitch factor. Some of our batsmen not being able to dominate spin like the previous generations also helps the opposition if the pitch is spicy.
On the Pant argument, have you seen his off-side play? It is extremely textbook and some of those drives and cuts can be delightful to watch. The main (and possibly only?) technical issue I see with him is his lack of balance in certain leg-side shots, especially when he goes aerial. In a test match though, he doesn't really have a need to go for big shots and it shows in the way he batted at Gabba, preferring shots along the ground to keep the scoreboard ticking. There have been worse cricketers in terms of technique who have ended up having very fine careers, I doubt Pant will be one to fall away.
As for his record, England was his debut series in which he was flown in the middle of the series and he still managed a century (a dead rubber it might have been on a very flat pitch, but this was special to us given him being a debutant). The NZ tour was a collective failure and while I admit I expected much more from Pant, he was pretty heavily mismanaged in the weeks prior to the series, being dropped after a concussion in white ball cricket and having no real assurance over his test spot with Saha supposedly the first team choice according to the dressing room.