D
Deleted member 9102
Guest
Edit: Chris Gayle
Rosickys no where near a better player than Carrick, just because Carricks not banging all the goals or constantly winning 50/50's doesn't mean he's a worse player than those that do that. You just have to be able to take notice a bit more of what he does, plus watch carrick V Roma. Rosicky couldn't even dream of playing like that no matter how well he's playing. As for Hargreaves I'll wait to see how he copes in a full season after a broken leg and only a few games
What a place in the UEFA cup qualifying stage in 2009?yeah Rosicky can dream beyond what Carrick did vs Roma
What a place in the UEFA cup qualifying stage in 2009?
Ok, so Rosicky is more attacking than Carrick, would you rather have Scholes or Rosicky, again easy answer.
Forget all Ronaldo's trickery, Scholes one of our 2 or 3 best players last season, he's a football genius and we missed him so much 2 seasons ago, as much as you missed Henry. He'd be a miss to any side.Rosicky is younger and hasn't even peaked yet. I would prefer Rosicky unless we're talking about Scholes a few years ago. But, I would never choose a Man U player over a gunner. Never
Forget all Ronaldo's trickery, Scholes one of our 2 or 3 best players last season, he's a football genius and we missed him so much 2 seasons ago, as much as you missed Henry. He'd be a miss to any side.
yes fans like you, people who think a player who did nothing last season is better than 1 who came into a side, receieved recognition from everyone at the club and more people. the kind of fans who thought Rooney did nothing last year and the kind of fans who would take Rosicky, a player who's done nothing over Paul Scholes. Paul Scholes. Seriously? Carrick was our only signing. United without Carrick=2nd, United with Carrick= champions.
Mybe mediocre was harsh lol but in comparison to united and chelsea when you look at the points you were mediocre in a lot of aspects. Mediocre yet we eat you twice and should have beaten Chelsea twice
He has the capabilty to play better than Carrick easily is basically saying the same thing. By saying easily then you are obviously saying he's better because you're saying there wouldn't even be a challenge for him to play better than him.He obviosuly can't play better than Carrick easily or he would have done. You would choose a united player over an Arse player if the united was better. It's got nothing to do with a club loyalty. I would Fabregas over Fletcher, i fail to see why you can't bring yourself to do that.
Yep mediocre might have been slightly harsh, however they wont win the Premiership again unless they improve their form against the smaller sides. They only lost once in 6 games to the other 3 top sides last year, however they still came fourth, that says something really.