Eoin, Virat or Umar?

[Fatal Shot]

Weak comparison.

Kohli has played well against Sri Lanka and Bangledesh, on flat pitches.

Morgans only been a hard hitter of the ball, and a good one at that, but still has a lot to prove.

Akmal's scored runs in tough conditions, against good bowlers, and actually has runs in all three formats of the game. So obviously it's him.

 

[BKB1991]

Weak comparison.

Kohli has played well against Sri Lanka and Bangledesh, on flat pitches.

Morgans only been a hard hitter of the ball, and a good one at that, but still has a lot to prove.

Akmal's scored runs in tough conditions, against good bowlers, and actually has runs in all three formats of the game. So obviously it's him.

True.

This shouldnt even be a comparison. One of them is already proved himself wheras the other two still need to

 

[khalek]

Kohli loves dew on the outfield

 

[Aoun13]

Tough one but i would give it to Virat Kohli because he has a more sound technique then the umar akmal and eoin morgan.

DO you meaning of technique?
Umar technique is much better the Virat.with Virat technique he will shuffle in front of wickets against in-swings.Virat body flow is not that straight as of Umar.

 

[Fatal Shot]

Virat has a better technique, but Akmal has more natural talent.