thedon5
Panel of Selectors
If you wait you could even get him for 10-15 m possibly.
And knowing our luck with injuries, he'll need a bit more than just horse placenta to stay fit.I don't think we need another striker - he'd cost what: ?30m? Wouldn't that be better spent on a holding midfielder? We still haven't sorted out a ball winner for next season - I'm not sure if that's Jones' best position.
You honestly think after the trasnfers of Fabregas, Nasri, Adebayor, etc, that the bitter Arsenal fans would like him if he went to City? Not something you'd want from the club you supposedly love. The fact is though, the fans have every right to be angry. Had it not been for Wenger and Arsenal standing by him through his injuries when we could've bought better (i.e. someone who didn't take up all the space in the treatment room) he'd be asking for change on the streets of Rotterdam. One good season and he leaves... Also complete rubbish if you think Arsenal can't challenge for titles in the next three to four seasons while he'll still be here. 20 points below without our best midfielder from last season and with a terrible start. It's a young squad, and with some signings it can get much closer. If he goes to City, it is for money. No way around it. May be for titles too, but really Juve and Utd could also offer titles, also Chelsea. He is going there and it will be for money.
Nasri barely fits into the City first team and is easily the weak link. He will be gone very soon. First time I'm hearing anyone say he actually did well, come on. Look at the seasons all the other City attacking players had, even Tevez who was on holiday half the time had a bigger impact. He would've had a permanent spot on the bench if Hazard was signed, that's obvious. Adebayor massively failed and Toure failed his drugs test and deteriorated as a player also. Clichy wasn't that great at Arsenal either and continued it to City.
RVP is one of the few, yes. But guys like Higuain and Fernando Llorente should be much more in demand. I'd be happy if we sold RVP and got one of them, I'm sure City or Utd or whoever would take either of them as well.
Though I suppose he does have Premier League experience and is such a creative forward. Nevertheless, the team revolves around him at Arsenal and he gets limitless opportunities. That fact and how injury prone he is will ensure he fails wherever he goes.
I don't want him at Arsenal another season. Highest bidder gets him I say. I hope to god that isn't Man Utd, Chelsea or City though.
In other news, this could take a while to sink in for the Indian football fans. Sunil Chhetri signs for Sporting Portugal.
Sunil Chhetri joins Portuguese football club Sporting Lisbon - Sevensisters Post
This guy deserves it. Buckled under poor facilities in India, but he's finally found the place he deserves to be in.
He'll play for the B team but that shouldn't bother him, he'll have a worthy pre-season and shouldn't take long before he makes it to the first team.
Hope this is just the beginning for Indian Football. Or brakes on a bus down the slope.
Let's look at Arsenal's squad. Full backs: Sagna, Gibbs, Santos - all three are injury prone with no other cover. Midfielders: Arteta, Song, Rosicky, Ramsey and Wilshere. Wilshere missed the entire last season with injury, to rely on someone so young after a season out with serious injury is ridiculous. The rest of that midfield is not an elite midfield. Forwards: Walcott, Gervinho, Park, Chamakh, Chamberlain. Not exactly a consistent attacking force.
The signings they've made - a player who's continuously underperformed at club level and a forward who had 1 good season in ligue 1 (where have we seen that before?)
Even with van Persie, that squad is going to struggle this season.
Ultimately he's nearly 29 and won't be at his peak much longer. All he's won in his career is a UEFA Cup and an FA Cup. If he truly wants to further his career he knows he has to leave Arsenal now and go to the team with the most ambition - Man City.
Given the form Nasri showed for a half season in his final season at Arsenal, he's disappointed at City because he hasn't shown that consistently enough but he obviously didn't have a bad season - that's just a ridiculous statement. He did well but can just do so much better. Given how much Silva dictates play on the other side, it was always going to be difficult for him to settle but despite being in his shadow, he gave a good return.
Toure did well at the start of his City career, especially in his first season. But Lescott improved massively as a player and overtook Toure in his absence. Clichy has looked better at City than he ever did at Arsenal - especially in the second half of the season. Adebayor is the only player to have "failed".
The team is a few signings away from a title challenging team.