AliB
ICC President
India
AFG...
Mumbai Indians
PlanetCricket Award Winner
Adelaide Strikers
X Rebels
Yes we might be partners being VT?This seems like a frustrated reply tbh, Sod. I sense something between Ali and Sodium..
Yes we might be partners being VT?This seems like a frustrated reply tbh, Sod. I sense something between Ali and Sodium..
You said that Rudi has cleared you as Town, so should we trust you just because someone said so?
You seem to support FP at this, so you both might be partners? Or You have supported AK earlier in the game. So you two might be partners. The initial reason given for thoughts on me being the partner of Ali was not clear at all. The common link was me and him lynching AK. And FP says we both are partners based on that.This seems like a frustrated reply tbh, Sod. I sense something between Ali and Sodium..
That is right. If we go according to their logic, Rebel and FP are certainly partners as they seem to be supporting each other quite frequently.[DOUBLEPOST=1521810275][/DOUBLEPOST]You seem to support FP at this, so you both might be partners?
And there is a reason for it. I don’t believe that I must declare a person mafia if I find his posts a lil’ sus. I think we must not jump to declarations, before getting enough evidence.Yash hasn't (I don't think).
Surely that doesn't help the scum. If there was 'no lynch' scum would get only two kills. While if it so happens that there is hammer to 'Lynch' , scum would get 3 kills. (one Lynch kill and 2 nk). You have said what we wanted to listen, but indirectly. Advocating the Lynch someone in daytime and kill someone at night. 3 kills together.If I was scum, I could have jumped on the no lynch bandwagon pretty easily.
And there is a reason for it. I don’t believe that I must declare a person mafia if I find his posts a lil’ sus. I think we must not jump to declarations, before getting enough evidence.
Surely that doesn't help the scum. If there was 'no lynch' scum would get only two kills. While if it so happens that there is hammer to 'Lynch' , scum would get 3 kills. (one Lynch kill and 2 nk). You have said what we wanted to listen, but indirectly. Advocating the Lynch someone in daytime and kill someone at night. 3 kills together.
Unlynch
I've been posting from the start of game whereever necessary. What baffles me the most is, how come you call most of the players of this game as scum, one or the other time and change your mind to wherever you want to.Notice how since I posted my thoughts on the game - Sodium, AliB and PS have all called me scum.
So would you still Lynch him or move on just because he hasn't called you scum? I can be .the desperation in you calling for people based on just assumptions you made and not solid in any way.Yash hasn't (I don't think).
Because, there is a classic way of listening to other players too before lynching someone. Not just lynch someone and push everyone to Lynch against that person.Now, to be fair some predates that post, but also notice how none of them have voted to lynch me.
So indirectly you're saying those who are not lynching are suspicious? For you not jumping on no lynch bandwagon justifies that you're not suspicious?If I was scum, I could have jumped on the no lynch bandwagon pretty easily.
I have tried to not act stupid and to lynch someone (Just because he is against me). But you're consistently pushing 4-5 people in the name that we're posting suspicious stuff and are not active enough. You're missing that few people are less active than even us. It's good that you're trying to push people to talk when people are inactive. But it's getting far.@all - Notice how since I posted my thoughts on the game - Sodium, AliB, and PS have all called me scum. Yash hasn't (I don't think).
I've said this at the start of the game. If we have something solid, we should go for lynch. If we don't have anything solid, we shouldn't risk the life of a fellow townie. But we should at least analyse the game so that we can have some info when we enter the day 2.Scum having the day closed after 14 hours because of inactivity, getting 2 free kills and Day 2 starting with noone having much of an idea of each other is preferable as scum to a robust Day 1 where everyone forms and posts opinions.
As FP said earlier, you were saying that FP was scum. But now your assumptions takes an U-turn and you say that he might be Townie. Similar behaviour to that of FP. Keep shifting...I don't want to lynch you now. As you never know we might be townies fighting against each and Mafia watching and enjoying us. But if this gets going, I will not hesitate to lynch you.
You have called it:@RUDI - I'm not sure if you allow this, some mods do and some don't, but I won't be around for close of day.
I am happy for you to vote for me by proxy for any of AliB, PS, Yash, Sodium should that vote act as hammer
I'm now calling this a tell. It was always an excuse I used, more often as mafia than not and others have done it too.
Let's call it the I have a life defence.
'The author of a post citing real life excuse to either justify not offering evidence of an assertion, or to delay the analysis/voting stage of the day is likely anti-town'
Yes. I suspect him to be scum. But no one knows who the scum is in real. I didn't said I don't suspect him to be a scum. I said we might be townies fighting with each other.As FP said earlier, you were saying that FP was scum. But now your assumptions takes an U-turn and you say that he might be Townie. Similar behaviour to that of FP. Keep shifting...