B
Bigby Wolf
Guest
The ICC team of the decades are absolute jokes.
Are you a cricketer?I have the same number of Twenty20 centuries as Jos Buttler, in 248 fewer innings
I mean yes, but I still boast a fearsome zero innings at that level.Are you a cricketer?
Why do batsmen usually become captain? Isn't it unfair with the bowlers?
Not necessarily. We have superb captains who are primarily a bowler.Why do batsmen usually become captain? Isn't it unfair with the bowlers?
That too might be a psychological and emotional reason if I think over it.I think the rational is it stops bowlers playing heroball and bowling themselves into the ground.
Not necessarily. We have superb captains who are primarily a bowler.
But I guess it has more to do with the things a captain has to do during the time a team fields.
A bowler generally guards the third man or something similar as he has to bowl from the other end during his spell. While most captians happen to be in the inner field. To manage a side well.
Besides a captains has far more things to take care of during a fielding phase,
He has to set fields.
He has to change bowlers.
He has to check the over rate.
Et cetera. Et cetera.
A batsman can well equip with this as he doesn't have to concentrate on bowling. Whereas a bowler, in addition to all of the above. Has to deal with the line, the length, run up, pitching in right area. So it might become cumbersome for a few.
Not to say we have got tremendous bowlers who captained their sides very efficiently. Jason Holder, Imran Khan, Daniel Vettori, Lasith Malinga, Anil Kumble, and many more. I just happen to miss so many for now.
Post automatically merged:
That too might be a psychological and emotional reason if I think over it.
Not the case anymoreI think I also read it somewhere that it has been due to the tradition from the earlier era, when the batsmen were usually the rich merchants, who would lead the team, while bowlers were the poor workers. Thus it was rare for bowlers to become captains.
Not the case anymore