Karachi
Associate Captain
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2013
- Online Cricket Games Owned
Exactly. Most of the people consider Virat as next Sachin Tendukar (even I do for some similarities in quality between the two) Maybe this is one of them?
Kohli in many ways is better then Sachin. But that is only if you consider how cricket is played today. He is aggressive, whereas Sachin was moderate. But Sachin Syndrome could be a commonality. We need to wait a little more to find out. Essentially, players awarded captaincy based on stardom - instead of readiness & willingness - tend to face such performance & decision-making problems.
Successful captains like Imran Khan & Steve Waugh had been around enough time not just to understand their own abilities but also of all the opponents of their times. Though they were superstars if you look at their stats & performance you'll realise they never focused on big scores for themselves but on innings & bowling figures that would contribute to team's victory. They were also risk takers & would take maverick decisions. I.e. Imran promoted Wasim Akram to middle order in place of Salim Malik during WC'92 Final knowing that Wasim not only could but would slog. If you listen to their interviews & follow their captaincy methods over the years you'll realise they were willing to risk stardom & their captaincy for victory - ironically that only ended up strengthening their captaincy. Sachin as a captain was reluctant to take risk. Kohli today was reluctant as well. i.e. he could have sent Pandya up the order. On the other hand, Sarfaraz - though still learning the traits - risked shuffling the batting order today & it paid off.
Last edited: