Pakistani Army
Panel of Selectors
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2006
- Location
- Sheffield, England
- Online Cricket Games Owned
- Don Bradman Cricket 14 - PS3
Rohit, say you're following the mods words and not taking this flame war further, but you're doing it anyway... Hmm.
Anyway, your point is weird. zMario showed that 2 people (him and another member on a different forum) both live in Islamabad, and both have similar stories about meeting this guy. I'm not sure what there is to not to believe...
You don't have to believe him, but you might tell us that ICF is a great source of cricket. (what a joke that will be) Also, where did he say Kamran Akmal is a better player than Gilchrist? I believe he said something like Kamran played the better innings (the one time show) than Gilchrist, which is true.
Gilchrist never did a 39-6. However, Gilchrist is consistently the better batsman. I am not sure where you get your information from, but my suggestion is you carefully read the posts.
He also never said Tendulkar is a bad test batsman. Please quote him on that, because having searched quite a bit, I could not find any evidence of him saying that.
He has always maintained Tendulkar is overrated, and unless he changes that in the next 2 years, his (and my) opinion shall not change. And it also helps when Tendulkar doesn't show his bat to the umpire when he clearly had no inside edge
If your not interested, then what do we all care? Don't post, simple as that. And you're the one taking this thread off-topic, accusing him of lieing, and whatnot.
Anyway, your point is weird. zMario showed that 2 people (him and another member on a different forum) both live in Islamabad, and both have similar stories about meeting this guy. I'm not sure what there is to not to believe...
You don't have to believe him, but you might tell us that ICF is a great source of cricket. (what a joke that will be) Also, where did he say Kamran Akmal is a better player than Gilchrist? I believe he said something like Kamran played the better innings (the one time show) than Gilchrist, which is true.
Gilchrist never did a 39-6. However, Gilchrist is consistently the better batsman. I am not sure where you get your information from, but my suggestion is you carefully read the posts.
He also never said Tendulkar is a bad test batsman. Please quote him on that, because having searched quite a bit, I could not find any evidence of him saying that.
He has always maintained Tendulkar is overrated, and unless he changes that in the next 2 years, his (and my) opinion shall not change. And it also helps when Tendulkar doesn't show his bat to the umpire when he clearly had no inside edge
If your not interested, then what do we all care? Don't post, simple as that. And you're the one taking this thread off-topic, accusing him of lieing, and whatnot.