ICC Champions Trophy 2017

What's the point of using Hardik, if you're going to use Yadav and Yuvi aswell?

There is no point in picking him. His presence just makes Kohli feel secure about the batting. Its not about the bowling resources we have. Its out thought process. If Pakistan had a pool of Shami, Umesh, Bhuvi, Bumrah, Pandya, Jadeja, Ashwin to pick 4 bowlers from they`d surely not have picked this current attack that India are fielding. Against Bangladesh, we had a chance to use an out and out pace attack, just like the warmup game.

We feel games can be won on batting alone. I thought that the mindset would change with Kohli but it seems to still exist. The only good thing about picking Pandya is that bowling Pandya would ensure that his batting gets utilized as well.
 
Last edited:
Wonderful show up by Bangladesh so far. Great intent, attacking mindset. Indian bowling is all over the place at the moment.
 
When did he mention Latif? You're just obsessed with him or something.

No he didn't and I am sorry to say but yes I am obsessed about Latif? Why? It's people like him that create tension between people like me and you. I bought Latif up because he is an expert and If I were a Pakistani I would find it hard to criticise any pundit from any country after what he did.

To be very honest, I am very proud of the Indians on this community. That video was not a 'criticism' it was an all out insult of India as a country. There's no use saying at the end 'It's not directed at India when you've torn them apart all video.' So if one of you is going to come out and criticise an Indian on something like that, I will give it back and if you want to label it as obsession, that's fine by me. I think you're being a bit of a dimwit about this because neither you nor me want to fight about our countries or our issues, but develop a friendship but you have a habit of poking your nose in my arguments with others inspite of us having discussed to death about Indo-Pak cricket.
 
These overs by Jadhav tells you why he is more valuable than Pandya to this side. I was defending his inclusion over Pandya a few days back. Somehow, his bowling seems more assured than Pandya`s. Pandya seems to have no plan at all. He just comes and releases the ball with the hope of getting away with it. While that might be alright for a 4th seamer, it surely is not fine for someone who is effectively playing the role of a 3rd seamer.
 
Bangladesh have got themselves in trouble here. They were all set to score 320+ but now 280 is looking difficult. Anything below 300 will be easy to chase wih the kind of batting India has currently and also Bangladesh's bowling is not good.
 
No he didn't and I am sorry to say but yes I am obsessed about Latif? Why? It's people like him that create tension between people like me and you. I bought Latif up because he is an expert and If I were a Pakistani I would find it hard to criticise any pundit from any country after what he did.
Oh yes, just because an idiot records a video we can't criticise pundits anymore.
 
Last edited:
As I told before, Jadhav is the 3rd name I put forward in this Indian team.

And didn't Jaddu bowl all his overs in a single spell ?
 
As I told before, Jadhav is the 3rd name I put forward in this Indian team.

And didn't Jaddu bowl all his overs in a single spell ?

If we get to the final, we need to have a serious rethink of this lineup. Bring in one more regular seamer in and this attack goes from defensive to threatening in one go.
 
TBH except for the last over vs Bangladesh in ICC WC T20. Pandya has never impressed me with the bowl.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top