As far as we could tell at the time, Darrell Hair didn't confirm Rudi Koertzen's suspicion, rather the 3rd umpire was inconclusive and Koertzen went with his first instinct. Clarke's protest suggests that he didn't hit the ball.stevie said:I think they've got it just right with the 3rd umpire. If the unpire feels there is sufficient doubt, he can confirm his decision, or alternatively, it can confirm an umpires suspicion (the Clarke bat pad catch). Overall, its a good move, which the umpires seem quite happy to take advantage of!
Where would you find a neutral umpire for the World XI? Zimbabwe?andrew_nixon said:By the way, does anyone know what happened to having two neutral umpires out in the middle for Test Matches?
I take your point, but I would have expected that neither umpire would be Australian.angryangy said:Where would you find a neutral umpire for the World XI? Zimbabwe?
JamesyJames3 said:lol, yea, that is a lovely comment
Havent seen any highlights or footage from the game yet, but how did Harmisson bowl?