mattfb
Chairman of Selectors
but who is Ponting to give him out obviosuly he is going to say whats best for his team.
No, he gave Dravid not out when he nearly took that catch in the first innings.
but who is Ponting to give him out obviosuly he is going to say whats best for his team.
No, he gave Dravid not out when he nearly took that catch in the first innings.
no that is because he wasnt sure, thats why i said before that it is hard for the person catching the ball to make the decision if the ball carried. and in that case it should be the TV ump that makes that decision.
ponting had no business being involved in that decision both times the TV umpire should have been used.
ofcourse the umps are to blame the most in this but Ponting should not have even done that he should have just told the ump to check with the Tv umpire.
if he was so sure that Clarke caught it than he should have had no problem with the TV ump making that decision.
because its is not his decison to make, if he was to stick to his code of being fair he should have asked for the TV ump.
you know Matt me and you can argue about this one for a long time lol, but i will say that it should not have even come to this. This all goes back on the ICC and their rules, this is just a mockery of the ICC and the way they do things.
im still surprised noone has mentioned the catch ponting tried to claim,
where obviously he grounded the ball and still carried on appealing
Lol yeah... But can I add one thing? Did Kumble agree to the pre-tour policy of accepting the fielders word? Because if he did then the umpire shouldn't have even had to tell Ganguly he was out. Ganguly was the one not showing sportsmenship by not going off after the fielder claimed the catch.