While I didn't find Johnson impressive, I still think it's worth a shot to see whether he still has that voodoo with India. I'm trying to comprehend how India might be susceptible to something they have an excess of, the only good reason I can come up with is that maybe their bowlers are not so tall and they are troubled by the extra bounce.Nah, I can see Johnson going for a pounding in this Test Series.
Why do people keep saying Johnson was impressive in the Sri Lankan series?
He was given the best possible situation to bowl to and he still only averaged 30 odd with the ball?
That's not impressive at all.
We should be going with 4 pacemen.
Shaun Tait - Now there is someone who can knock the Indians over.
It is kind of weird seeing that they had plenty of left-arm seam bowlers in the nets in Zaheer, Irfan and RP.And it seems like India have a problem with left arm seam bowling; this time the tall Victorian med-fast bowler Allan Wise. As if that's not annoying enough, they can expect to see the last day of their practice match almost entirely rained out. Their bowlers might not even bowl an over at this rate.
I beg to differ--inside edges are more or less almost completely dependent on luck. They miss the stumps 50% of the time and they hit it 50% of the time. Apart from that, Tendulkar doesn't play those sorts of shots early in his innings in test matches. As we saw on the England tour, he destroyed his opponents in the tour match but was much more sedate in the actual test matches.And iceman, come off it, a wicket is a wicket, edging onto the stumps isn't unlucky; it's a bad shot or a good ball, but not just luck.
While I didn't find Johnson impressive, I still think it's worth a shot to see whether he still has that voodoo with India. I'm trying to comprehend how India might be susceptible to something they have an excess of, the only good reason I can come up with is that maybe their bowlers are not so tall and they are troubled by the extra bounce.
India have an uphill task,they somehow need to come thru the 1st test with a draw and then they might have a good chance in the series.howz the weather forecast for the 1st test??
Like you not Johnson biggest fan but his record against India even though it's ODI is impressive. Also Wise showed the way in the tour match so I'll keep him to see how he goes. This will be his biggest test, if he fails then bring in Tait. This is where playing 4 pacemen would make it easy for us to see which of Tait/Johnson should get the 3rd pacemen spot in Sydney and Adelaide.
If our batting order is as good as it as looked recently, I'd definitely advocate 5 bowlers for Adelaide. Anything to reduce the chance of the opposition scoring more than 400, which any good batting side is likely to do.Like you not Johnson biggest fan but his record against India even though it's ODI is impressive. Also Wise showed the way in the tour match so I'll keep him to see how he goes. This will be his biggest test, if he fails then bring in Tait. This is where playing 4 pacemen would make it easy for us to see which of Tait/Johnson should get the 3rd pacemen spot in Sydney and Adelaide.
I think you need more saying why Tait should be left out for Hogg who has an awful FC bowling record in Australia which is where the Tests are being played.
For India, I'd go with:
Wasim Jaffer
Virender Sehwag
Rahul Dravid
Sachin Tendulkar
Sourav Ganguly
VVS Laxman
Mahendra Singh Dhoni (wk.)
Anil Kumble (capt.)
Zaheer Khan (1)
Pankaj Singh (2)
RP Singh
I'm going to go with Pankaj Singh over Ishant Sharma because Pankaj Singh has greater experience leading the attack for Rajasthan and is a consistent performer. Bowling at around 125-135kph, he still bowls a good line and length and gets good bounce whereas Ishant is erratic and bowls no balls. Ishant may be better for skittling a weak side on a sticky wicket but I believe Australia will amass around 350-500 and so, Ishant's skills of innings anhiliation won't come into play. I think it is a no brainer that RP Singh should bowl as a first change after how fantastic he did as the first change in England, attacking middle orders well with conventional (rather than new ball) swing.
I think that Virender Sehwag should come into the side and open the batting. I would prefer Aakash Chopra but he is not in the squad. Sehwag opening can take the attack to the opposition rather than letting Australia bowl to defences which they can make their way around or catch the edge of. He can also mean India can stick to the batting order which has brought so much success in the past. Established batting orders are a great strength and with two having extraordinary records and the other two being in sublime form, it is an order not to be tampered with - even if Yuvraj has to sit out.
Virender will be slaughtered if he opens the batting. Mark my words.
Ganguly still isn't good against the quick ball and will either spoon one up or go after one. Jaffer doesn't like it up there either. Laxman isn't great up around his neck either. Dhoni can be tested, patience wise.