India in Australia

[SciD]

Sachin robbed of Ton. Noone seems to be out lbw and bowled at perth. how can u miss that rauf u idiot.

 

[mattfb]

Gone!!!!! Looks a bit high though at first.

Gone? Whos gone?

 

[SaiSrini]

Oh! Not a really bad decision, but that should have gone in the favor in the batsman seeing the height and that it was a tad outside the line of off stump. But no complains coz there was another decision early that was close (though that was slightly clipping top of off stump).

Edit: It looks more worse now with all those close replays being shown. Very tough! Sachin fans should feel robbed of a ton!

 

[RickyLegend]

Gone!!!!! Looks a bit high though at first.

I wish i could watch it! My local channel has the news still on!

 

[sohum]

Hmm... I'm not convinced by the Sachin dismissal but it was marginal enough to not be a poor decision. The appeal from Australia was pretty decisive, too.

A shame for the great man because he looked in great touch.

EDIT: Yeah, it was actually pretty bad, in the end. Hit him over the height of the stumps!

 

[Gilly Fan]

I wish i could watch it! My local channel has the news still on!

Ha ha. Where abouts do you live? Just get 3 mobile.

 

[mattfb]

I wish i could watch it! My local channel has the news still on!

Really? Where do you live?

 

[catdad2001]

i can't believe it.the umpires have done it again to india. -:

 

[rabbitoh rob]

Sachin robbed of Ton. Noone seems to be out lbw and bowled at perth. how can u miss that rauf u idiot.

did you miss him plum infront on 49 off Andrew Symonds?

Anyway was a bad decision

 

[prarara]

Oh! Not a really bad decision, but that should have gone in the favor in the batsman seeing the height and that it was a tad outside the line of off stump. But no complains coz there was another decision early that was close (though that was slightly clipping top of off stump).

Yeah it was marginal. I actually would have thought the other decisions, or the one off Clark was closer to an lbw than this one. Well here's hoping Ganguly continues his form and or Dravid gets a big one.

 

[SaiSrini]

Hmm... I'm not convinced by the Sachin dismissal but it was marginal enough to not be a poor decision. The appeal from Australia was pretty decisive, too.

A shame for the great man because he looked in great touch.

Yeah, my initial reaction was I felt it could be close. So it was not a very poor one like the ones in Sydney, but I find it hard to believe how it went in the favor of the bowler.

 

[rabbitoh rob]

i can't believe it.the umpires have done it again to india. -:

He was plum infront on 49 of Symonds, so i dont think your that hard done by.

 

[Gilly Fan]

Hmm... I'm not convinced by the Sachin dismissal but it was marginal enough to not be a poor decision. The appeal from Australia was pretty decisive, too.

A shame for the great man because he looked in great touch.

EDIT: Yeah, it was actually pretty bad, in the end. Hit him over the height of the stumps!

As long as you don't carry on like last game (Not you, but the others), then I'm happy.

I heard that Tendulkar had one against Symonds that would've gone on to hit the stumps.

 

[Leicester Fox]

lol Mark Nicholas, "it may be that the effigies are already going"! That wicket looked like it was coming, Lee was giving them all sorts of problems.

 

[SaiSrini]

did you miss him plum infront on 49 off Andrew Symonds?

Anyway was a bad decision

That was not plumb. I spoke about it above. It was just clipping the bails (as said by Hawkeye). With the wicket having very good bounce, the umpire will find it very tough to give those LBW.