sohum
Executive member
But, the thing is that without the Monk, the Indians would have been in a bit of trouble. I believe there is nothing you can take away from the Monk, in this innings. The pitch was a little slow to start with, which didn't suit his game. He played straight, he took no risks (at the top of the innings) and he eventually got on top of the bowlers. Once he was dealing in boundaries, the bowlers became inaccurate and that resulted in more boundaries.
If you saw the second session, the West Indies bowlers were far more composed and they kept it on their line and length. Run-scoring wasn't easy any more, and there was also a bit of zip and pep off the pitch. I think the Monk's brilliant innings coupled with the West Indies inaccurate bowling has gotten India to a good score, here, and not so much the pitch. Let's see how the Windies bat, though.
If you saw the second session, the West Indies bowlers were far more composed and they kept it on their line and length. Run-scoring wasn't easy any more, and there was also a bit of zip and pep off the pitch. I think the Monk's brilliant innings coupled with the West Indies inaccurate bowling has gotten India to a good score, here, and not so much the pitch. Let's see how the Windies bat, though.