You can't call Laxman's innings selfish by any stretch of the imagination. It was just a loss in concentration, as the runs were starting to flow and it is a natural reaction to let down the guard a bit. It wasn't a particularly special ball, but it was a good catch.
Lara would have to enforce the follow on, because there are a few batsmen in the Indian team who can make the difference. Three of our most important wickets were gifted away by the umpire, so we can only hope that the bowlers don't hit our pads in the second innings while Jerling's umpiring.
As usual, the arrogance and bias of the commentators is coming through. They carp and quarrel about Sreesanth's wickets not being given out while they were so quiet when Jerling happily sent Dravid, Kaif and Dhoni back to the pavilion on contentious decisions. And now they're harping about how Munaf Patel should have "character" instead of facing the bodyline bowling and getting hit. I wish I had a way to communicate with these "great" ex-crickter commentators.
Drewska said:
I slightly disagree with you on that. He needed to stick around for his hundred, and then maybe had to hit a few big shots to get pass the follow-on mark. Sreesanth has goen now, India could lose this..
I don't know about losing this one. Sehwag looked good, as did Jaffer. Dravid was beaten by an inswing that could have gone either way in terms of the decision of LBW. Yuvraj was a disgusting shot and he would want to make amends in the next innings. Kaif was, quite simply, not out. Dhoni was also not out, although his decision was closer. He wasn't looking too comfortable, though. Laxman played well.
I think if we get some decent umpiring from both ends, our batsmen are good enough to play out 4 and a half sessions.