The problem is not the formats. The problem is the context.
Administrators are too dumb to understand it, people are always looking at short term solutions or recent results.
I've been on the forum ten years and I have always said that cricket needs this-
A two tier test championship of 8 teams each with the team coming last from tier 1 to be demoted to tier 2 and the winner of tier 2 to be promoted to tier 1 in a 4 year cycle.
An annual ICC champions league in the 50 over format with 10 teams in it where each plays the other thrice in the year at a home/away and neutral venue. Whoever wins the league, wins the league.
One World Cup every 4 years in the T20 format with the format followed for the 2019 WC (50 overs)
The rest is all franchise cricket and whether anyone likes it or not that is the reality. I see current IPL owners soon having enough capital to have their own teams in all leagues and with auctions losing their charm a cricketer like (for example) Mitch Marsh can be hired by X franchise for X amount of money to play for all these franchises over the year. It is going to happen and the faster people and more importantly administrators realise this, the better the health of international cricket will be. If people are dreaming that the IPL window won't get bigger then they are again delusional because it will simply because it is a cash cow. I see it as an all year event in the future with games on weekends only and squads having 30-40-50 players contracted to them where international duty players will not be a part of it but others will.
International cricket needs meaning and bilateral cricket is on the ventilator since a decade. You just have to pull the plug.
Agree with you on the context but fiercely disagree on the propositions suggested. What
is the difference between the Champions League and the
World Cup when they have the same number of teams? Only in cricket can we have a
World Cup with ten countries participating and celebrate it as a global event whilst having twelve full members. It isn’t just the World part that makes me laugh, it is also the Cup part of it. The Indian Premier
League and the Big Bash
League will have more knockout games than this supposed World
Cup. Might as well call it the international T20 league that happens every four years^TM.
The format of said tournament also generates numerous dead rubbers. The only reason why the 2019 WC didn’t to that extent was because England had a mini wobble mid-tournament courtesy of Roy‘s injury. Look at the IPL this year to see how many meaningless games were played because plenty of teams knew they wouldn’t be able to qualify. The 2019 WC’s reputation all stems from NZ‘s exploits and
that final. If it weren’t for those two knockout games involving the Black Caps (and a healthy dose of English media fuelles hyping) we would have called it one of the worst tournaments ever. A World Cup is a tournament where I believe every game should matter in some way and every fixture for the most part needs to be high stakes. A dead rubber should be the exception like in the past tournaments rather than the norm.
I also don’t like the test tier format as I believe it means you’ll never see the weaker side play against opposition that are clearly much better. I believe that whilst it results in thrashings it also helps the weaker sides gain much valuable experience beneficial in the long run. That can be sorted by arranging friendly tests I suppose between nations in different tiers. However I feel having only one side be promoted over a four year cycle is too slow and will just disincentivise countries from taking the entire concept seriously as they would have no chance of ever getting into the first tier.
In conclusion I feel you’re being as short-sighted over the progress that can be made by other countries as our glorious administrators in today’s sport are.