Shaw is a fun batsman to watch when he is in the mood. Between him, Padikkal, Gill, Jaiswal and Gaikwad, India should have a huge selection conundrum for the opening spots post Rohit and Dhawan.
mayank and rahulShaw is a fun batsman to watch when he is in the mood. Between him, Padikkal, Gill, Jaiswal and Gaikwad, India should have a huge selection conundrum for the opening spots post Rohit and Dhawan.
Maybe because the UP vs Gujarat match is in the Arun Jaitley stadium while the Mumbai Karnataka one is in the secondary Delhi stadium?What is wrong with Star Sports? They are not broadcasting Mumbai vs Karnataka?
Balls.
can be the reason, unlucky to miss out on watching it thoughMaybe because the UP vs Gujarat match is in the Arun Jaitley stadium while the Mumbai Karnataka one is in the secondary Delhi stadium?
KL Rahul?Shaw was ludicrously good and clutch. If he can keep this form up in the IPL, he'll easily be the white ball partner (mainly ODIs) for Rohit going forward.
KL Rahul?
What makes you say Pant's playing style isn't suitable for ODIs? Not sure if I agree to be very honest.I'm not sure if the current management wants him to return to an opening role when he's done well at five as the keeper. I still don't think Pant's playing style suits ODIs well at the moment unless he gains some significant experience to alter it. Kishan might end up challenging Rahul for the keeper's role soon enough.
Rahul's also very sedate when he opens which would basically kill our powerplay chances. We cannot afford a below 60 run partnership in the first ten overs in a modern ODI. Shaw on the other hand has the sort of maniacal attacking skill and energy that very few in our setup have. Still needs to prove his consistency to get back but he has made the best start possible.
What makes you say Pant's playing style isn't suitable for ODIs? Not sure if I agree to be very honest.