Nice rant. Fabulous. I don't really watch highlights as well, sometimes when matches come, I sometimes watch the match entirely for about a sesion. Do you prefer T20 or Test? That was a really good "essay". Valid points. ACB is trying to attract crowds to Test cricket by introducing the pink ball.Why do you think ICC will go against the grain of what the audience wants? Ultimately ICC and the boards are driven by business and where the business is higher, the payments are determined accordingly. If the revenues from T20 is huge and the revenues from test cricket not so huge, then the payments to players for T20 leagues/T20's are going to be much higher and therefore much more lucrative than test cricket. Ultimately audience attention drives everything. For the audience, a 3 hr. T20 game is far more entertaining and quicker than a 5 day test match. Those days people used to watch test matches and built up that nostalgia for it because shorter versions were not available. But now it is. This is all "natural progression". Let me put this out now - Test cricket CAN NEVER BE made more lucrative than T20 going forward. That dream can easily be called "unrealistic" and "impossible".
Yes we can make test cricket more exciting but a T20 will always trump it when it comes to the today's mainstream. For e.g. today I can't watch an India test match in its entirety. I only watch end of day highlights. Because I am used to the quick moving things. At the end of the day, its a sport and you do not want a sport to take up substantial amount of time of your life when you could be doing other productive things. Therefore a format which entertains you and at the same time frees up your time will be craved for.
Nice rant. Fabulous. I don't really watch highlights as well, sometimes when matches come, I sometimes watch the match entirely for about a sesion. Do you prefer T20 or Test? That was a really good "essay". Valid points. ACB is trying to attract crowds to Test cricket by introducing the pink ball.
So we have Binny, Ashwin, Jadeja, Bhuvi at 5/6/7/8 .. very strange
If only we had Raina and Yuvraj instead it would given us so much more depth. And I am sure they wouldnt have been any worse with being used as part time spinners
Sorry dude...... I didn't mean rant in a bad way....... I said your points your points were valid, and in that way, I liked what you said. Some great points. We aren't even arguing at all.Those were my viewpoints. Classifying it as a 'rant' is rude. We are having a friendly argument here and I am not here with the intention of trolling.
You watch a session? Well how long is a session? 2 hrs, ~30 overs. How long is a T20? 3 hrs, 40 overs. People can watch 2 T20 games for one single day of test cricket. That's 10 games for a single test match. Which one people are going to prefer? If this option was available to people in those days, test cricket might not have been as popular. No other sport in the world wastes 5 days to get a result for a single game (and that too a result isn't guaranteed - a draw is also likely after toiling for 5 days).
The only reason why I want tests to survive and keep happening is because of the nostalgia (well I was born in that era when the great players made test cricket entertaining enough) and for its uniqueness. I don't have any attachment whatsoever to the format itself (people talk all about it being a test of skill at highest level - well I don't really see the need to test skills at that amount of expense of time). And to make it entertaining and relevant, my proposal is to make it elite. That way, it remains among countries who have a history for test cricket and also who are really competitive enough to make the format entertaining.
Again... Terrible team selection. Looks like India do not really care about this game.