Cricketman
ICC Chairman
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2005
- Location
- USA
Because I reckon Britain, is just a tad safer then India.......:sarcasm
Having lived in both countries I can safely say that I never really felt a difference in terms of security. In good areas India matches any western nation. The only thing cricketers have to worry about are the fans, and they have never hurt anyone. We just smother them with love .
I'd probably even go as far as saying that Britain is more dangerous simply because it's a bigger target (being a West/White country and all).
Listen, an attack can happen anywhere. You can never predict when, who, how, where. Just take a look at the attack on the Tax offices in Austin. Or the military officer a few months a go who shot up a few cadets. These were in AMERICA. 7/7 in Britain, 26/11 in India, 9/11 in America.
This doesn't happen very often but I have to say I agree with Modi here. Way more than adequate security is being provided. They stay in the best hotels with commandos from the army guarding them. If these guys keep bringing up security concerns they are never going to come, whether it is in 2010, 2011, or 2015. Why should all the owners and the boards have to bear those expenses?