Mitchell Johnson or James Anderson?

[lewbis05]

anderson is better

 

[somersetargyle]

yeh johnson has been great in these "bowler-friendly conditions"

 

[Graham Swann]

In my personal opinion, James Anderson is far better. Mind, i'm judging this on what i've seen of Anderson and Johnson in the Ashes. I've heard he did very well in South Africa, but South Africa is a great country for bowling. I really like Anderson's action, and he has been great for England. Anderson > Johnson.

 

[OffCutters]

Anderson at the time, but Johnson is deadly when he gets his bowling right ( eg.South Africa), and when Mitch does, he`s better than Anderson.

But at the moment, i voted for Jimmy.