puddleduck
Chairman of Selectors
I don't think the fact they seemed to retire every 6 months ever helped
But, is that not because they were rated. Very highly in fact, but they had their flaws and as such will sink into the annals of excellent players of their own time, but perhaps not ones that transcend their time?
No talk of Inzi? I am astonished.
For me it's Chanderpaul and Dravid. The Walls of Cricket
Anybody had a thought about Australia's 1987 World Cup winning captain Allan Border.He stood strong and held Australian cricket together when legends like Dennis Lillee,The Chappell brothers,Jeff Thompson etc retired in the early 1980s.It was a time when Australia were struggling but Border helped them through with strong performances and when he retired in 1993 Australia had one again become a formidable side and then the Waughs and other good players took over.Even I think the former wicket-keeper Ian Healy was under-rated too because he couldn't bat like Gilchrist but in crucial matches and close encounters he took Australia home and was a very aggressive batsman.
Allan Border and Ian Healy are clearly one of the most under-rated cricketers even though their contributions were so high to Australian cricket.
maybe, but most players have their flaws. if you look a miandad's record for example, it pretty much puts him along side viv, border and gavaskar in the 80s.