Steve Waugh and Hussey are suggesting we should go in with 2 all rounders and drop a paceman. Don't know what is with the all rounder love all of a sudden. We don't need Symonds for his bowling so I would definitely stick with the 3 quicks with Watson. And we also need to see where Lee, Johnson and Clark are at with their bowling after below average form in India.
Totally agree
WHY?????
Did they not see our main problem in India was BOWLING!!! So they want to put an extra batsman in the team
What would they do bat Watson at 7 and Haddin at 8? That wastes them. We need to test their batting ability. Watson could be our #6 for the next few years if he can show an ability to make consistent runs, but no lets demote him to #7. Same for Haddin, poor guy has struggled in Test cricket so far - yeah lets put him at #8 that'll help
:
Not to mention our bowling. We'd have 2 proven bowlers!!! Lee and Johnson/Clark. Then you'd have Watson, Krejza at your next level, followed by Symonds, Katich, Clarke and Hussey if needed. That is not a good attack, please don't do that Aussie selectors :upray
But I still can't decide who I want. Watson didn't bat consistenly well enough in India to cement #6, but surely he is the man for the future, not Symonds (given he can actually bowl
, and he's quite a few years younger). Yet Symonds brings experience and a reputation plus some plan B off-spin if Krejza gets belted by NZ somehow. All I know is I don't want both...