New Zealand Tour of India, November 2010/11

And another goes.

Poor shot from Dhoni really as there was absolutely no need to play at it when it was so close to him and the end of the day was nearing in. Martin's having an absolute blinder.
 
Christ Martin, are you God in disguise?


India need to get over this horrible habit of being crap in the first test of a series :p
 
NZ really need to seize this opportunity. Hopefully they can run through the remaining batsmen and wrap this up. Exciting!!
 
It would be great to see us win, but I just feel like all this is too good to be true...
 
This must be embarrassing for you Indian fans, you're batsmen aren't playing like world number 1's, and they're only playing NZ, what are we About 7th? Even more brilliant from an NZ point of view is that over the hill Martin is steamrolling a full strength Indian batting line-up in their own backyard.

NZ's to lose from here.
 
We are actually 8th now if im not mistaken. Dont know how that happened though cause the West Indies havent exactly beaten anybody.
 
VVS must be sick of constantly having to rescue India in the second innings. :p


One feels that, despite his century, Dravid's career is dwindling to an end.

Sehwag was unlucky, God knows what's happened to Raina, and Sachin's inability to get runs under pressure is gonna come under scrutiny again. MSD was doing well, but his batting form has slipped of later. Might go and dig up some stats on that.

Gambhir with twin failures too. He needs to find form quick before the WC.

Haven't seen Martin bowl, just following Cricinfo, so can't tell if it's been good bowling, lackluster batting, or some combination of the both. Or even if it's the pitch.
 
And on a different note - I've notice India's spinners seem to have been bowling with a weird sort of plan of late in Test matches. Flat and tight for the most part, but the occasionally tossing the ball up and getting rip and turn and drift.

Surely they'd be more effective if they both kept tossing the ball up, no? It seems like they're intent on building pressure and keeping runs down, and getting the batsmen out when they look to attack the few hittable deliveries. It might have worked against sides like Aus and may be a legit tactic on flat pitches, but surely with NZ's batsmen not being as good against spin, and with them being under pressure to bat to save the match, it would have been worth letting Ojha and Bhajji attack?

And on that note...are these orders decided by MSD/Gary Kirsten, or are both Bhajji and Ojha given freedom to do as they like, and choose to operate this way? And also, is it possible sides have been racking up 400+ against our bowling so frequently because our spinners are letting themselves be milked away as part of a plan, and if they kept attacking, while the possibility of being hit for over 4 RPO exists, we could potentially be shooting out sides for around 300ish?

ZoraxDoom added 11 Minutes and 34 Seconds later...

End of days play. Bhajji scores one more run, and he's India's third highest run scorer in both innings.

Lead is 110. And, despite everyone's expectations, all 3 results are possible going into day 5 (4 if you count a tie)

Fun stuff.
 
Last edited:
NZ win - 70%
Draw - 25%
India win - 5%

My prediction before the Test Series started is going right. That India always play bad after playing good cricket with top teams. Told you, don't be optimistic!
 
Sachin's inability to get runs under pressure is gonna come under scrutiny again.

That is pure BS. He has scored runs under all situations, ODI or test over the last 2 years. Each of his knocks in the Aussie series was under pressure. India were 30/2 facing 480 in the second test match when he scored his 200.

India have paid for being complacent and would have to face the consequences by losing this game. However, this game kind of reminds me of Ahmedabad 1997 when we beat SA defending 200-odd. Srinath ran through SA that day. I don`t know how many here remember that game though.
 
India still have a real good chance if Harbhajan can get going tomorrow and Laxman stays in. I just have the feeling we will collapse even chasing around 150.
 
Lol just came on to check the scores and wtf is happening?

Still think India is gonna win but well played by the kiwis :clap
 
That is pure BS. He has scored runs under all situations, ODI or test over the last 2 years. Each of his knocks in the Aussie series was under pressure. India were 30/2 facing 480 in the second test match when he scored his 200.
I'm not saying I agree with that, just saying that people are going to bring it up. Especially the Indian media / Tendulkar critics.
 
This must be embarrassing for you Indian fans, you're batsmen aren't playing like world number 1's, and they're only playing NZ, what are we About 7th? Even more brilliant from an NZ point of view is that over the hill Martin is steamrolling a full strength Indian batting line-up in their own backyard.

NZ's to lose from here.

For what, to have one bad innings from nowhere? :rolleyes

On a serious note, pitch could be very dangerous for the batsmen on 5th day. Let's see tomorrow. This is where we badly miss Jumbo. Gambhir's out of form should now knock the door for Murali Vijay in team XI.

ZoraxDoom said:
Sachin's inability to get runs under pressure is gonna come under scrutiny again.

Lets just get back and bother to see what Sachin has done this year alone(2010),

  1. Forgot the pressurizing 100 against SA during following on? India lost still.
  2. Pressurized 84 runs in following on again Vs SL
  3. In the same series against Lanka, when SL put a might 650 on the board, he kept his head cool along with Laxman and Raina with a double ton. It's not easy to do that after a following on defeat in previous match.
  4. Tendulkar's first innings 100 against Bangladesh also add to the pressurized one because, wickets kept collapsing in other and Sachin's ton took our score to look atleast a competitive one. ( 243/10 )

Summary of his career in 2010 :-

First Innings Average - 107 ( 965 runs in 10 innings )
Second Innings Average - 59 ( 357 runs in 7 innings )


Total - 1322 runs in 17 innings.


Now, in which world can people or whichever media can claim that Sachin's scoring under pressure is under scruitiny? Just because he failed once or twice? you call this as PURE RIDICULOUS!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top