My logic is out of 10 matches, don't judge only last two matches. Going by his logic, Kohli didnt perform for so many matches since that 200. So, he should be dropped ? lol. That's ridiculous.
And about what I have indicated in bold, performing in only 4 matches should not earn a call. Rahul didn't perform only for 4 matches. He is been performing consistently since past 3 years. Not freaking only 3 matches like Gambhir. Why should he be replaced ?
Just don't tel "according to your logic" in each line if you can't understand what I tell. I never said judge only by 4 matches and compare to don bradman. tbh you are acting little childish bringing don bradman and sachin into your post.
What I am trying to say is, if a player is performing well, do not replace him. Rahul is performing well and he should not be replaced !
And you said "Gambhir's career is good too. May be he is out of form for few years." So you accept he is out of form and still you want him to replace in form Rahul who didnt play well in just last two match ? Yes. Because f### logic right ?