B
Bigby Wolf
Guest
Oh yeah Tamil Nadu that RCB Bangalore thing .Haha. No problem And both played for RCB at some point but they didn't play for Karnataka
Oh yeah Tamil Nadu that RCB Bangalore thing .Haha. No problem And both played for RCB at some point but they didn't play for Karnataka
Now my question is-
Do Vijay Shankar and Md Siraj gets another few chances ?
Both definitely deserve more chances. It wasn't easy for Shankar, first international where he bats, and he's immediately put under pressure. He played a few blinders for TN but unfortunately, he was thrown into deep water straightaway. He seems like a big hitter like Pandya and India must persist with these talented individuals. He could even replace Pandya if he plays more internationals. As for Siraj, he had to learn it the intro to int.cricket the hard way. Most certainly, a couple of domestic games and the IPL can help groom his game. He's got pace, but he's got hit everywhere this series. Needs some work but another talented seam bowler India can work with. There are a lot of talented blokes that have been part of this squad, the selectors mustn't take their eye off them.Now my question is-
Do Vijay Shankar and Md Siraj gets another few chances ?
Which again isnt DK's fault nor MSD's fault. No other keepers could build their international reputation when Gilchrist was around as well. One must understand that there is only 1 wicket keeping position in playing 11. If DK was really exception he could have easily fit into another role at other positions. Now I am not saying DK is bad but I am not even saying he was superb. He did get plenty of opportunities and he failed to make his mark. India always struggled with middle order batsman he could have really made one of the positions his. So yes DK played exceptionally well today and without his innings we would have not won, yes he is in exceptional form off late but MSD is not the "SOLE" reason DK and like couldnt build international reputation before.Thumbs Down to anybody who compare DK to MSD. MSD is the sole reason DK and like of him couldn't build an international reputation before.
One major negative for India from this series will be that the senior players never played their part as senior players.
In every match just when one of the senior guys is hitting the ball well he has forgotten about the match situation and got out at the wrong time.
At that moment where they could have easily taken the match from the oppositions grasp they play a rash shot and got out
Thats the difference when playing with Kohli and Dhoni
They both read the match situation so well and dont just keep hitting the ball unnecessarily.
Manish Pandey does not look a technically sound player by any means.
All of his innings are scratchy right from the start.
So the role of playing him in the middle overs can backfire big time.
He has problems rotating the strike and his strike rate in any match situation is below 100
Kedar Jadhav is a moron in terms of cricketing brain
Pandya has problems hitting fast bowlers for runs in the death overs and most of the teams have cracked this code by now just like they did against yusuf pathan when he played the same roll like him in the indian team.
Therefore Indian team is not settled one bit going into world cup 2019
Md Siraj did not seem like a good prospect for limited overs cricket. He seems like a line and length bowler and might actually be suited for the longer format. Still too early to call.
Shankar has done just about enough to be in the reckoning for Pandya's backup, but still plenty to prove for him (as well as Pandya)
I am a fan of Raina and his all round talent, but what can be the justification of not picking DK over him now. DK delivered in the highest of pressures scenario, is as good a fielder and is in top batting form. Raina brings his tidy overs into the team but has been repeatedly throwing away his wicket and has dropped a couple of dolly catches. On top of that, we have Pandey knocking on the doors for a spot in the middle order in ODIs.
He only played once in his whole career three series together.Which
Now again Australia did not have any trouble starting from openers to lower order. Haddin who was a mediocre keeper could find his place because Aussies did not worry about it. Look at how many matches Yuvi and Dhoni won for us being in that middle order. Karthik during those opportunities did not make a lasting effect. Also as a keeper he was pretty okay too. One more factor you do not consider is Dhoni was the captain wicket keeper, Gilchrist was not. Its not as easy to replace a keeper who is of a better mental and physical capacity and now add the captaincy factor into it.He only played once in his whole career three series together.
The most test matches he played was in 2007, the most ODI he played were in 2010 and he was dropped for 3 years then.
When Gilchrist retired they had Haddin to replace him immediately as he was rotation-ally tried out in other formats.
Karthik didn't have the management back support, he wasn't given chances like Rohit Sharma(Series after series he failed).
Sorry I used sole reason I think the better term would be major factor.
If MSD was as selfless and intelligent as people claim he would have used his last year to build up another keeper but he didn't as he knew it would only shorten his playing career.