jdbais
International Cricketer
As long as the bowling is fun, it doesn't really bother me whether or not there is autoplay. As Andrew said, what are save games for?
nickypoo said:If you worried about how long the game is going to take to play why dony you just save it then come back to it. By the way the bowling on BLIC is excellent with proper swing seam etc and you actually have to work to get the batsman out.
I understand, but just play Twenty20 matches. They are more fun and are easy to complete in a day, even with C2K4, which means BLIC should be a breeze...Midas said:To be honest I cannot believe that autoplay isn't included in BLIC. Like people have said some people don't have the time to play an entire test match. Sure, it's fine saving the game but I, for one, would lose interest in that particular match if I constantly had to do that over a prolonged period of time (For me, I'd play at the most about 2 hours a night after work so it would take a while for me to complete a test-match.)
I think a lot of people will just want to be able to turn their PC/Xbox/PS2 on and play a game without becoming bored of batting or bowling which I think they would if there's no autoplay.
Personally, I think that with all the hype surrounding BLIC people are setting themselves up to be disappointed. I'm sure it will be a good game but I guarantee we'll hear all sorts of complaints about it once it's released.
Its for people who only get time during weekends and can afford to play the game for only 2 or 3 hours.Sureshot said:Autoplay is for lazy people!
autoplay is for people who dont have enough time.Sureshot said:Autoplay is for lazy people!
If he's restricted to Twenty20 games then he's hardly experiencing what the game has to offer- Codies are alienating the arcadey type audience which they seem to be looking at based on the puzzling choices in regard to front/back/advance shots. You people who think that it's not an issue are taking a remarkably short sighted view of things- even assuming that the AI is absolutely perfect and the bowling system is reasonably good, I'm sure some people don't want to have to take the time to play 450 overs worth of cricket- if you say that they should just play one dayers, then once again Codies have really restricted options for players in the game. Also, assuming good AI, if you hit a perfect wicket then you may end up bowling 150+ overs to the CPU- now I don't think that's fun at all in video game form, in real life certainly but this is not real life. Basically there's now two options, have great AI and force the player to slave through hundreds of unrewarding overs, or have sh*t AI and eliminate the option of having a competitive game- even in Cricket 2004 I could get a decent game from the CPU by autoplaying the embarassingly bad bowling, but what the hell do I do here when we figure out the bowling system (which I'm sure we will)? Just give them runs? Complete crap- and everything I've said is based on the fact that the bowling system at least will be mildly interesting, what's the other case scenario?ZoraxDoom said:I understand, but just play Twenty20 matches. They are more fun and are easy to complete in a day, even with C2K4, which means BLIC should be a breeze...
Can't wait for the Demo
It is not hard but a pain. each team will have minimum 20 players. 10 times 20 = 200 players. We have to change at the minimum 200 names??morgs said:1. The spoof names can be easily changed via the player editor. How hard is it to change Shane Warnby to Shane Warne? Not an issue!
morgs said:2. In real life cricket the advance shot is rarely used only when going for a slog. Seriously how many times a game would you play it? Once, or twice? It's not that big a deal.
morgs said:3. When playing the original BLC even though you could not chooser between front and back foot shots it was obvious whether it would be a front or back foot shot due to where the ball was pitched. For example when the ball was pitched short on the off and you played an offside shot the batsman would play a cut, whereas if the ball was pitched up it would be a drive. Furthermore, how many times have played front foot in EA cricket when you should have played backfoot, or vice versa.
morgs said:4. The fact that there is no autoplay is a GOOD point. It means the bowling is very good and needs to be mastered. The way I see it if a cricket game has autoplay, the bowling is atrocious and should not even be there.
morgs said:5. I completely disagree here, I think it has very good graphics. The pitch, atmosphere, crowd and players look superb and give it a great feel.
No, that's what save games are for.0601731 said:Its for people who only get time during weekends and can afford to play the game for only 2 or 3 hours.