jesus! got sour grapes anyone?carmichael said:Yeah they always call up indians, pakistani, west indians, sri lanka's etc for over appealing and there actions but this is so rarely ever seen for england australia and new zealand the whole icc board is corrupt.
carmichael said:Yeah they always call up indians, pakistani, west indians, sri lanka's etc for over appealing and there actions but this is so rarely ever seen for england australia and new zealand the whole icc board is corrupt.
surendar said:If a player shows a slight expression against umpires he is being fined or even banned for 1 or 2 matches!! But a decision like this ( POOR POOR ) should bring him a life long ban to cricket : so that it will lesson to other umpires..becos watching a noball is a basic thing and no excuses for forgetting the basics!!!!!
I think you haven't read the posts before that.He was saying that in context of excessive appealing by Andrew Symonds. :rickyp said:jesus! got sour grapes anyone?
you can say all this stuff as much as you want but nothing is going to come of it. Ill be the first to admit that dhoni and harbhajan shouldnt of been out, but you talk about it as if its never happened before! thats cricket, get on with it. For the record, umpires miss no balls all the time, for all we know, they could have missed all the no balls on aussies wickets. We just dont know this because they never show a bowlers feet when its not given a no ball
Cricket_60 said:Geez mate, give him them a break! They are only human, and human's will make bad decisions.
carmichael said:Yeah they always call up indians, pakistani, west indians, sri lanka's etc for over appealing and there actions but this is so rarely ever seen for england australia and new zealand the whole icc board is corrupt.
Cricket_60 said:How can the rules be the same for both player's and umpire's? They both perform completely different tasks in a game of cricket.