and that's why Australia lost that series. Look at his strike rate.Cricket_60 said:2 (14)
16 (48) (Australia got rattled for 93 this game)
49 (80)
46 (68)
79 (90)
Avg: 38.4
.
cricket doctor said:and that's why Australia lost that series. Look at his strike rate.
Cricket_60 said:Australia lost the series due to some freakish batting by Herschelle Gibbs
And those aren't bad strike rates either (11 off 50 is bad )
Yup sure is. I am beginning to like this guy now. Used to consider him useless not so long ago.angryangy said:Watson's got 2 wickets, I think he's the winner of that contest.
As did many people. When was the last Australia had a genuine all rounder?m_vaughan said:Yup sure is. I am beginning to like this guy now. Used to consider him useless not so long ago.
He's really improved. He has more tricks and his batting is more confident.m_vaughan said:Yup sure is. I am beginning to like this guy now. Used to consider him useless not so long ago.
Depends on your definition of genuine all rounder. Probably have to go back to Keith Miller for someone with genuine fifty-fifty talent.nightprowler10 said:As did many people. When was the last Australia had a genuine all rounder?
It was great batting on a tough pitch, followed by good bowling.shravi said:Australia win the DLF Cup by bowling West Indies out for 113. It was a great bowling performance.