angryangy
ICC Chairman
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2004
I'm not implying any stereotypes. You're the one being overly negative and hyperbolic.cricketmad09 said:And did he?
You are implying all these positive stereotypes that have no relevance to Katich.
My point is, they obviously saw fit to play cautiously. Whether or not they should be less cautious is up to them only, if Katich had hit just a handful of boundaries, you would be less critical. He clearly doesn't spend every innings scoring 20 from 60 balls, look at his statistics, he is capable of hitting some runs.
Considering the last couple of matches, they have a much better chance of getting to 250 as a result of having wickets in hand. I'm not saying you have to commend every batsman who can stonewall, but it's not always the end of the world, especially if that batsman has protected some power hitters.
Speaking of, just look at Symonds, he's not going a mile a minute, is he? Are you complaining about him? Of course not. What if he goes out before he makes up the runs? Then he's just as bad as Katich, right?