The problem England players seem to have is that they're always being scrutinised. You look at Swann and Anderson in Tests and everyone always says they need to prove how good they are overseas. The problem is that you get Indians, Aussies, Pakistanis etc, all saying this for each individual tour and the moment they don't perform in one series, they're written off. Nobody is going to average 25 in every series they play, yet as soon as they have an average-bad series, they're labelled over-rated.
----------
I actually disagree on Warner. I think he's got a reputation as a good ball striker with potential to be a good Test player, which is exactly what he is.
I'd agree on McCullum being over-rated, although he's just not an opener in Tests, which doesn't help, as he looks out of his depth.
Also for over-rated, I'd go for Morne Morkel. Yeah, he's a decent bowler, but he's no where near Steyn's level. He just prays on batsmen who can't play bounce well, which will get him a hat full, just ask Steve Harmison, but he's not the world-beater that everyone seems to think he is.
----------
I actually disagree on Warner. I think he's got a reputation as a good ball striker with potential to be a good Test player, which is exactly what he is.
I'd agree on McCullum being over-rated, although he's just not an opener in Tests, which doesn't help, as he looks out of his depth.
Also for over-rated, I'd go for Morne Morkel. Yeah, he's a decent bowler, but he's no where near Steyn's level. He just prays on batsmen who can't play bounce well, which will get him a hat full, just ask Steve Harmison, but he's not the world-beater that everyone seems to think he is.