CaptainOZ
Panel of Selectors
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2004
It might probably is but it's hard to tell as I've only played it for a couple of hours, and only about half an hour against the AI. There are a lot of things which are definitely better.
If you think about BLC99 was missing a lot of stuff. Think about what you can do now that you couldn't in BLC99:
- swing the ball with pace bowlers
- do your own catching
- do your own throwing
- set your own fields
- choose to play front- and back-foot shots
- defend the ball in a certain direction
- notice bowler and batsman confidence and stamina
There are probably more. The reason BLC99 is so highly regarded is that it was tremendously well balanced. What I mean by that is, the competition between bat and ball was very fair and scores and run rates seemed to be about right in both ODI and Test matches.
Also, a lot of the core things were just 'right', like the bounce of the ball, the speed of the ball, the amount of spin, and even the way the various environmental factors would affect the gameplay. I remember that a green pitch was always a real struggle to bat on, and felt genuinely difficult, and batting on hard pitches required faster reactions but was ultimately easier to score on.
Once a new game gets close to getting these core things right, it will be absolutely miles ahead of BLC99.
Being able to defend the ball in certain directions is pretty huge. It's such an integral part of cricket - pushing the ball into the gap or dropping it short of cover and running through for the quick single. Not only does it keep the scoreboard ticking over, it's a handy way to get off the mark!