So it has been quite a long while now since I really dug into this playthrough. With me starting teacher training in a bit under five weeks, I really should take a careful look at the things I've done well and poorly in constructing this playthrough, as well as how I can change things up just a little bit to make it more sustainable to run while most of my energy goes into teaching. After all, this playthrough has spanned several editions of the game and several years of my life: I am a different person to the one that started this. (Obviously the game is still exactly the same.
First XI: Things I'm glad about
1: Phil Tufnell and his 511-wicket career
This one goes without saying I think: I am delighted to see Tufnell and a few others get the sort of sustained opportunities that they almost certainly should have had during their real-life careers.
2: Steve Rhodes never played a Test match
It's for the greater good.
3: My England save has had a continued commitment to a proper keeper and five proper bowlers
At times this hasn't been the easiest thing to achieve: at times it led to madness at number six and seven (think Chris Lewis and Jack Russell, or Chris Read and Ian Salisbury), but for the most part I think it has led to more engaging games of cricket over the course of the save.
4: I've been able to stick with some good players, even if they didn't do very well in real life
What's the point in a playthrough like this if there aren't new heroes who didn't amount to very much for the real-life England team? The most obvious example of this is Nick Knight, whose Test batting averages continues to hover around the 50 mark. Ryan Sidebottom, who has made an explosive start to his Test career, looks like being the next big thing.
5: I've maintained a commitment to proper wicket-keepers.
While it would have been easy to pick Alec Stewart as a keeper the whole time and strengthen the batting around him, I'm glad that I've remained committed to playing a proper keeper. This has meant that Jack Russell played 94 Tests instead of 54, and that Chris Read is getting a longer rope than he did in real life even as he struggles with the bat. I intend for this to continue for as long as the playthrough does.
6: I've given opportunities to new players in circumstances where they are most likely to succeed
Wherever possible, I've tried to give people their debuts in series where the opposition perhaps isn't all that - so lots of debuts against Zimbabwe, lots coming up against Bangladesh, and where I can, debuts are given against the early-summer tourists. Exceptions to this will usually be for exceptional players, such as young Jimmy being called up to have a crack at India.
7: I've tried to manage the workload of my seam bowlers.
So Cricket Captain genuinely doesn't give a shit whether I rotate my bowlers or not, but I've tried to manage their workloads wherever possible. This is somewhat as an extra challenge to myself, but it also feels like the best way to do right by those bowlers. Looking between now and 2005, I am likely to have a pace battery of Sidebottom, Jones, Anderson, Hoggard, Harmison and the all-rounders. Kabir Ali and Chris Tremlett are also likely to be on the fringes. I have no intention to be playing the same seam attack through a full five-Test series.
8: The match reports
I have generally felt as if the match reports have balanced having enough detail with not being a particularly excessive amount of work. I would not be looking to change their style as I continue the playthrough, as they're one of the things I think really work.
9: Having a complete set of stats
I'm a stats nerd. It makes me happy to know that I've recorded every one of Graham Thorpe's 5,691 (and counting) Test runs. Keeping track of opposition players' changed stats would have been very interesting too, but I can't go back and do that now - and it would likely have tripped the "too much work" switch.
10: Ben Hollioake lives
It didn't take
too much of a stretch to prevent Ben Hollioake's untimely death in my timeline. Where possible, I am also going out of my way for other players who suffered death or serious misfortune, so Umer Rashid, Simon Jones, Matt Hobden and Craig Kieswetter should all be okay as and when I get to their incidents in the timeline.
11: England has been a consistently good team
Although this is partly because of my having thousands of hours experience with Cricket Captain, it has certainly been fun finding out that England did have the talent available to actually do quite well throughout this period - even if we have been able to overachieve thanks to the vagaries of the game I've been playing on.
- - - - -
Second XI: Things I'm mad about
1: Nasser Hussain's dismal Test career
It might be odd for someone who's been lucky enough to watch the likes of Thorpe, Pietersen, Strauss, Cook, Root, Jennings and Brook go out to bat in England shirts, but Nasser Hussain was always my favourite player growing up. 20 Tests, 949 runs @ 27.11 and no appearances as captain do absolutely no justice to him. If I could go back and do this playthrough again, I'd want to find a way to get the best out of Nasser, and to give him more consistent opportunities. Now, it seems that his hundred in the 2002 NatWest series was the only way he could regain a place in the side - and I just missed out on giving him that recall.
2: I didn't do enough research
It was only in the most recent dozen series or so that I really think I put enough research into my team selections. Certainly throughout the early 1990s, I don't think I had enough knowledge about the circumstances and goals of the team at the time, nor about the players who were in the conversation when it came to selection. As a result, I missed out on some players who should definitely have got more of a go (players like Hugh Morris, Ali Brown, Keith Piper, Richard Illingworth and Neil Mallender immediately spring to mind) while also giving premature call-ups and debuts to others (Mark Alleyne seems like the obvious example of this). I was also quite hubristic when I was called out on this.
3: I missed some vital storylines
This was partly covered in the previous section about me not doing enough research, but I definitely missed some key storylines that the playthrough would have been better with. A good example of this is my decision to erase the inconvenient Rebel Tour from my timeline: this was stupid, and I regret it. Another example is my failure to select the tearaway young Duncan Spencer for the New Zealand series in 1994: of course it would have been too soon, but it would have opened the door to me making selections on the basis that
pace is pace, yaar, and that could have made for a more interesting team.
4: Inconsistency with injuries
Early in the playthrough especially, I was quite inconsistent when it came to player injuries. For example, Angus Fraser played 59 Test matches - a lot of them during the period where he was out of Test cricket for two and a half years through a long-term injury. While it was probably fine for me to overlook minor niggles and injuries picked up during real life Test matches (which of course no longer happen as I'm now playing as England), but something like a stress fracture or similar long-term injury should absolutely be considered.
5: I didn't always prioritise significant real-life players in my playthrough
Obviously Phil Tufnell has just spent a decade as England's incumbent left-arm spinner, but this has meant that it's 2002 and Ashley Giles hasn't donned an England Test shirt yet. That's obviously going to change soon, but I probably should have been looking to include him ahead of trying to make Ian Salisbury happen, or giving Swann his shot at Test cricket as a young man.
6: The captaincy
I slightly regret how I've approached the captaincy in this playthrough. At first, Hick had to stand in for Gooch because Atherton wasn't a fixture in the team at that point. He would then be replaced by Alec Stewart, who was the ODI captain at that time. This was a good way of steering myself back towards reality, and one that I failed to take when I
named Knight as the captain for the 2000 Zimbabwe series rather than Hussain. I would really like to go back and change that, but of course it is too late.
7: Cricket Captain's AI can't manage bowlers for shit
The biggest one here was the India-England series, where India would pick three or four spinners and then only two of them would ever get a bowl. We all know Cricket Captain is a very flawed game, but that was a
particular low point. It has definitely inflated my team's results above and beyond what they might otherwise have achieved. There isn't anything to be done here, but it is frustrating.
8: All players are rated as the best version of themselves
Because I'm having to run this playthrough using All Time Greats mode, all the players I use come into the side as a fully realised version of themselves. This is quite contrary to reality and has resulted in some strange outcomes: for example,
Andrew Flintoff really started his international career as a bit of a no-rounder, but when I'm picking him in this he probably has a rating more in line with the 2004-05 version of himself. It means I sometimes have to intentionally underuse players who I know would do well for my team for the sake of realism.
9: It took me a decade of cricket before I realised that I could do Test series of any length
Just unbelievably stupid from me: when this playthrough started, I used to edit the schedule a little bit to fit into the one-, three- and five-Test series available in All Time Greats mode. I regret the fact that it took me a long time to realise that if I had a two- or four-game series, that wasn't a problem. I also regret that I shortened the six- and seven-Test (in the case of the 1998 West Indies tour with the 61-ball Test) rather than working out how to make them happen.
10: My Paul Nixon obsession
Look, I absolutely love the bloke and he was definitely at least on the selectors' radar (he clocked up nine first-class matches for various real life England representative XIs between 1995 and 2001). But I also think that I was at times over-keen to get him in and around my England side: I'm a little disappointed that Nixon has ended up playing 34 Tests while Rob Turner, Keith Brown, Warren Hegg, Peter Moores, Steve Marsh and especially Keith Piper all ended up uncapped. I think I could have done better here. Love Paul Nixon though.
11: I didn't pay enough attention to England 'A' games
I made a lot of my selections using County Championship stats, as well as sometimes players who were doing well in ODIs. I should also have taken more care to look at England 'A' matches for inspiration. Players who might have benefited from this include Mark Nicholas, Graham Thorpe, Nasser Hussain, John Stephenson, Richard Illingworth, Richard Stemp and others.
- - - - -
Third XI: Things that might have to change
1: The World Rankings
Simply put, I don't think they add anything to this series except extra work. When I next pick this series up, I'll be discontinuing them; the Bannerman Shield will continue because I like that and it doesn't add much extra work, but the World Rankings will be first against the wall.
2: Listening to suggestions
I don't know everything, and if those of you who take a moment out to follow this series take the time to tell me I've missed a selection, or to ask why I've not included a certain player then I should certainly take the time in return to consider whether there is in fact room for them. It's noticeable that when I look back to the early days of the playthrough, I didn't do this.
3: The Barrington Medal
As much as I like having something that recognises the season's outstanding performer, I'm not sure if it really adds anything to the series. I genuinely don't know whether to continue awarding it or not, and would appreciate people's feedback about whether they care for it or not.
4: Try to bring the team back towards reality
While there will always be some differences, I would like to bring my England Test XI into a more realistic place over the next couple of years or so. I'm expecting retirements from three or four senior players, and I would prefer to try to replace them with similar players to those who were playing for England at the time. It'll never be a series that sticks
exactly to the same selections as real life (a decision I made
because Blockerdave was already running that exact concept), but I do want the same players to at least find themselves in contention where possible.
5: Stick strictly to real life schedules
I previously mentioned how it took me a
time to figure out that two-, four- and even six-Test series were possible. I have also
experimented with a series where the schedule can and will change from what happened in real life. That created a fair chunk of extra work, and I'll be staying away from that and other RNG based elements for this playthrough. It's just a workload thing really. The only thing that
might change is the ICC Super Series: if my England team is self-evidently the best in the world by that time, then I might play an England vs ICC World XI Test match.
6: Try not to bring players in too soon with the benefit of hindsight
I think I'm particularly guilty of this with players like Graeme Swann; I've picked him young, in line with when he got his initial England 'A' and ODI call-ups and he's done well for me. While that certainly hasn't done my team any harm, I don't know if I like where it puts me narratively. If and when his Test form dips, it may not hurt to have him fall out of the side for a little while.
7: Be more willing to reflect rogue real-life selections and near-selections
Of course, the 2000s aren't the era of wacky selections to the same extent as the 1990, but I think I missed out a little by not including some of the funkier picks in that decade. Without going fully "cricket on drugs", I think there is more room for experimentation than I previously allowed myself. James Hildreth must not go uncapped.
8: To Baz or not to Baz?
It's a long way off, but at some point I will have to decide whether or not to commit to Bazball (TM) as a style of play. Arguably, my style of play throughout the playthrough has been a bit Bazball; I go for run chases wherever possible, and I usually pick five bowlers with a view to taking 20 wickets in every game. But it is such a significant era of English cricket that I may have to genuinely look at whether I want to reflect it in the playthrough.
9: Oh Jimmy Jimmy
No fast bowler can possibly play 188 Tests for England. It's just silly talk. I don't know exactly how I will handle the great man's career, but it may well not last for as long as the real life Jimmy's did. Broad is similar. I don't yet have much of an idea how they will go out, but there may possibly be a theme of them going out on a high: past a certain point, something like a triumphant away Ashes series might trigger it.
10: Using a batter as my fifth bowler
As a result of my five-bowler strategy, several worthy batters have had reduced or non-existent Test careers (see: Hussain, N.). I may have to end up using certain batters with reasonable bowling ability as my fifth bowling option - such as a Paul Collingwood - rather than missing out on some very plot-significant batting options as I have done so far.
11: Do I commit to a regular schedule?
With the way my teacher training year is likely to be, it might be worth me trying to commit to a regular schedule. Not something hugely restrictive, but something like "on Sunday afternoons, I will do at least one Test match" and then I build it into my routine. Any more could then be a pleasant bonus, but the regular schedule should keep this thing moving once I get it going again.
- - - - -
As ever, I'd really appreciate some feedback on this - especially if there are people out there who are still invested in this series and its future. Thank you all