IceAgeComing
Retired Administrator
- Joined
- May 26, 2013
- Location
- Brussels, Belgium
- Profile Flag
- Scotland
- Online Cricket Games Owned
- Don Bradman Cricket 14 - PS3
- Don Bradman Cricket 14 - Steam PC
Expect a bit of a megapost: this is the best chance I've had to respond to people posting over Christmas. Not a lot has changed tbh...
This is exactly what I meant: I probably should have said "townish" or something to clarify it...
This is why I'm more suspicious of themusketeer: the middle of day 2 isn't really the time for random lynches of that sort: you either do that right at the start of day 1 or not at all. Like I said I am suspicious of both of them; but I have this hunch that joejoe is more likely to be the newbie town person that themusketeer. They may both be scum, but I currently doubt that since that would make the game have a bit of an anti-town bias...
I think my reasoning for the vote was sound, as is my reasoning for not wanting another no lynch. My position is that no lynches don't help the town because it is a wasted day, especially considering that whatever blocked a night kill last night is unlikely to happen tonight. The advantage of "no lynch day 1" is that it lets you have your power roles do their thing and get information (not something I agree with by rule since it generally creates a quiet day 1 and then PRs are acting pretty blind and you could end with one of them NKed: although it worked for us in this game!), a day 2 no lynch increases that chance that your power roles are not going to survive to report their findings. I don't just want to lynch anyone or I'd have jumped into the joejoe bandwagon - I was just concerned that unless someone decided to actually make a considered and rational vote then we'd end up wasting the day and that wouldn't be good for anyone.
On the thedon situation: that sort of quick post for a vote position does look suspicious, but if it was activity related then I can understand why you would do it. I think we should be a bit more lenient to that sort of thing around this time of year...
I think you've got the wrong end of the stick there. He thinks Muskateer is more likely to be town than joejoe, but at the same same time he isn't keen to totally excuse joejoe from his suspicions.
Correct me if I'm chatting out of my backside.
This is exactly what I meant: I probably should have said "townish" or something to clarify it...
it doesn't change the fact that themuskateer is equally suspicious since he lynched El Loco and later said that it was random.
This is why I'm more suspicious of themusketeer: the middle of day 2 isn't really the time for random lynches of that sort: you either do that right at the start of day 1 or not at all. Like I said I am suspicious of both of them; but I have this hunch that joejoe is more likely to be the newbie town person that themusketeer. They may both be scum, but I currently doubt that since that would make the game have a bit of an anti-town bias...
Exactly. What I'm saying is - if I haven't missed anything - he is the one to have lynched someone first, with a reason, that is. Maybe he wants someone out ASAP because there wasn't a kill the night before. I don't think he is mafia aligned just yet, just pointing this fact out.
I think my reasoning for the vote was sound, as is my reasoning for not wanting another no lynch. My position is that no lynches don't help the town because it is a wasted day, especially considering that whatever blocked a night kill last night is unlikely to happen tonight. The advantage of "no lynch day 1" is that it lets you have your power roles do their thing and get information (not something I agree with by rule since it generally creates a quiet day 1 and then PRs are acting pretty blind and you could end with one of them NKed: although it worked for us in this game!), a day 2 no lynch increases that chance that your power roles are not going to survive to report their findings. I don't just want to lynch anyone or I'd have jumped into the joejoe bandwagon - I was just concerned that unless someone decided to actually make a considered and rational vote then we'd end up wasting the day and that wouldn't be good for anyone.
On the thedon situation: that sort of quick post for a vote position does look suspicious, but if it was activity related then I can understand why you would do it. I think we should be a bit more lenient to that sort of thing around this time of year...