@weetabixharry, please refer below results from the latest PointerSearcher. Search A and C failed, was I need to follow certain steps to generate the success info. Plz let me I can rerun the Pointer again
View attachment 233053
@lish2642 I have looked more closely and now I can see that all these things have all changed significantly since Cricket Captain 2018. Even "SEARCH B" didn't actually find the right thing.
Therefore, it will not be possible to include these "Global" options in the 2019 Editor yet. If I can find time, it will be fixed in a later release. (I expect it will need several days of effort).
@weetabixharry With any guideline on the editor code, I can help you
OK so there seems to be no work around the regen players entering the game within 2 years of playing. It seems that however much you tweak the potential & ability of an existing player (32-34), the AI will always generate a better skilled player at a lower age (20 or so).
I agree that top skilled regens are exciting @weetabixharry However, there are a number of players in the Under 19 levels who are more likely to make the cut in 5-6 years time.@Prashanth S Kharche I think the game has a problem with how it models the effects of age. It looks like it hugely overestimates the negative impact of age on player ability. Using the Cricket Captain Scout, I noticed that all the older players (aged 40+) have enormous potential (i.e. peak ability), just so that their current ability is realistic, after the huge impact of age has been deducted.
For example, Paul Collingwood has batting potential about the same as AB de Villiers. (Collingwood was an okay batting all-rounder, definitely not the same class as de Villiers). The highest potential in the game is Shivnarine Chanderpaul. Yes, Chanderpaul was a very good batsman at his peak, but not better than Virat Kohli and Steve Smith.
So, I think this is part of the reason why young regens do so well. It's not something we could fix easily with an editor. Personally, I like it when brilliant new regens appear, but I agree it's probably not realistic.
I agree that top skilled regens are exciting @weetabixharry However, there are a number of players in the Under 19 levels who are more likely to make the cut in 5-6 years time.
It would be more realistic if they were given some enhanced abilities so they could play for the country rather than regen players cropping up out of nowhere.
Also, some of the exciting youngsters at age 21 seem to disappear from the scene in 3-4 years. I know that aspect is addressed in the database updates every year by the developer but my point is that the AI shouldn't disregard present players over regens.
@weetabixharry, just wondering... if you don't mind me asking, what is the Pointer Searcher program supposed to do? Also, what are the First and Second attempts about?